Secret Warnings About Wuhan Research Predated the Pandemic (THIS IS BIG, FROM VANITY FAIR) - The Great Awakening

Secret Warnings About Wuhan Research Predated the Pandemic (THIS IS BIG, FROM VANITY FAIR) (www.vanityfair.com) SUDDENLY Puzzle Pieces 🦠

posted 363 days ago by brain_dead 363 days ago by brain_dead +152 / -0

Secret Warnings About Wuhan Research Predated the Pandemic

A series of previously unreported alarms and clashes over US-funded research in China reveal long-standing friction between two groups of government scientists: those who prioritize international collaboration, and those who are kept up at night by the ide...

33 comments

33 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (33)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Slyver 2 points 363 days ago +2 / -0

I think this is a way to slowly break it to the normies.

Maybe, except my investigation has shown thousands of articles exactly like this. This is exactly what a limited hangout looks like. If this is "breaking in the normies," why didn't the thousands of articles exactly like this one going back through history "break in" all of those normies?

The only way to break the programming for certain is to show actual primary evidence (the stuff, straight from the source) which makes it unequivocal. If the brain can find a way out of the cognitive dissonance that allows for a person to "feel safer", then the brain will take that path. That is why things are presented in this fashion in a limited hangout, to exploit that tendency. The only way to break the programming is to present the information in a way that doesn't allow for that path, much less encourage it as this one does.

It is exactly the rhetoric that encourages that path of "safe space," which is replete in this article, that makes me think this is an intentional limited hangout.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q