Some would argue that it was impossible for Oswald to be a shooter, because there wasn't enough time from the shooting until he was found in the lunch room, must moments afterwards.
So, if it was impossible for Oswald to be a shooter ...
My conclusion is that it is HIGHLY unlikely that Oswald did it, especially as a lone gunman.
Nothing has ever been convincing that the head shot came from the rear and not from the front/side.
That is the main reason I conclude there had to be more than 1 shooter.
Whether or not Oswald was a shooter is less clear, but I lean strongly to no, based on rifle fuckery and him being spotted having lunch moments later.
His statement "I'm just a patsy" makes all the sense in the world -- especially when Rubenstein brazenly shot him in public shortly therefter. Somebody wanted Oswald dead VERY badly.
That statment does not mean to ignore evidence.
Some would argue that it was impossible for Oswald to be a shooter, because there wasn't enough time from the shooting until he was found in the lunch room, must moments afterwards.
So, if it was impossible for Oswald to be a shooter ...
You’re correct. If the single bullet theory is incorrect, then it’s impossible for a lone gunman conclusion
My conclusion is that it is HIGHLY unlikely that Oswald did it, especially as a lone gunman.
Nothing has ever been convincing that the head shot came from the rear and not from the front/side.
That is the main reason I conclude there had to be more than 1 shooter.
Whether or not Oswald was a shooter is less clear, but I lean strongly to no, based on rifle fuckery and him being spotted having lunch moments later.
His statement "I'm just a patsy" makes all the sense in the world -- especially when Rubenstein brazenly shot him in public shortly therefter. Somebody wanted Oswald dead VERY badly.