Connecting the dots - Is Donald Trump JR trying to tell us something? HRC? DEW? Weird …
🤔💭 Theory Research Wanted 😲💡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
DANDE measures atmospheric density at high altitude because true density deviates a bit from model predictions. Which is a problem because a difference in atmospheric density means a difference in atmospheric drag, which throws off the projected orbits of every satellite, telescope, and space station we have up there.
Optical wavefront control is used for error correction in telescope optics. This technology is being developed in Maui because it has a massive telescope on it, which needs this kind of error correction for more accurate data.
Your link to the chemical oxygen iodine laser has nothing to do with either of the above: as that is specifically designed to be an anti-aircraft weapon whereas the first two are purely for sensing applications. This should go without saying, but weapons-grade laser systems aren't going to be used on sensor equipment or telescopes. Vastly different power and optics requirements. Just because two different things both use lasers doesn't mean they're related; otherwise that would mean every single CD and Blue-Ray player is also involved in this nefarious DEW plot.
DEW advocates have still failed to provide concrete evidence that such weapons exist. All they have apparently is dandelion etymologies and wikipedia articles that vaguely reference barely similar technologies, utterly ignoring the vastly different applications and designs required. They still haven't answered the more obvious questions, such as:
Where do these DEW satellites get their power from?
How much power do these weapons exert?
How on earth did the cabal/white hats overcome the problem of atmospheric diffraction/absorption?
Why don't the cabal/white hats just beam in the power from a lower location, like a plane flying overhead or an offshore ship? This would go a long way toward reducing the atmospheric refraction/absorption problem and be orders of magnitude less expensive.
Why didn't the cabal order assets on the ground to start the Maui fires conventionally? That would be orders of magnitude less expensive than even the previous proposal.
Why did the Maui fires look exactly like normal fires? Every claim that the fire was "different" is based entirely on ignorance of how actual fires work.
DEW theorists are the new flat earthers and terrain theorists. No data, no actual understanding of physics or engineering, just speculation based on science fiction, and vague, subjective
conveniently and arbitrarily employedkeyword association.Instead of thinking "laser" we should, I think, be investigating Scalar Electromagnetic Technology, which requires far less energy to be destructive (or productive). c.f. Tom Bearden.
Scalar technology/weaponry is even more absurd than DEW, which at least tries to invoke real things like lasers.
You want to know what a scalar is? Vectors are magnitude and direction, scalars are just magnitude, like a regular number.
A firearm could be considered a "vector" weapon because it launches mass in a specific direction at a specific velocity. But it's not really a vector weapon because vectors don't cause damage or exert energy by themselves; they're just mathematical notion. Mass in motion imparts energy and damage; it's just that mass in three dimensional space has to move in a direction at a velocity at all times, and math just calls this motion a vector.
Scalar weapons (if they actually existed) would then have plenty of power, but no ability to actually aim said power. It wouldn't be able to do an omnidirectional blast, as that is still described by vectors. It would quite simply be a weapon that you cannot fire, aim, or move at all. And like the "vector" weapon above, it still wouldn't be able to do any damage because scalars don't do damage, they're just numbers and notation. It would be the most useless invention in existence.
Scalar tech/weapons/waves haven't been proven to exist, and proponents have to arbitrarily redefine core concepts in math and physics to make them halfway work in theory. And they rely on the public's lack of familiarity with math/physics to avoid being called out on this.