An interesting topic of conversation came up over Thanksgiving. My sister is pretty savvy on what's going down. She's aware of the Cabal. She's hip on Q (or at least mostly aware of the Q story). I don't think she is fully aware of everything, but far more than most.
But she also is not a fan of Trump. She recognizes that most of what is said about him is a lie, but she just doesn't like him. She thinks he's a blowhard and overly divisive. I agree with her, but I've explained to her (albeit briefly) why I think both of those qualities are intentional. However, she doesn't care. She does however love RFK, Jr. She said she would vote for him in a heartbeat no matter what party flag he waves.
I thought about it, and I think RFK, Jr. could very likely be a unifying force, not to mention that there is both a sense of justice and closure to the effort of Q if he became President.
What do you think? What if RFK is the democrat nominee, or even an independent. Would you vote for him over Trump? Even if not, even if you think such a statement is sacrilegious, do you think he would be good for the country? Do you think he would be a unifying force? Do you think him as President would bring honest debate to the table on the "hot topics?" Do you think he would be able to put an end to the propaganda driven division (not by himself of course, but rather, as part of the Q plan)?
Of course, I don't know what The Plan is, and I don't think anything can change the course, but there are layers upon layers to The Plan, and there is nothing better than a surprise ending, especially one that feels like Justice. Who knows. Maybe RFK, Jr. IS The Plan.
What do you think of him as President for 2024?
You gotta be kidding with this question. He is anti 2nd amendment. He believes in climate change. Just to mention two fundamental differences. He is still a controlled opposition, even though he is probably far less compromised than most.
I see his role as waking the left to certain things, and sucking votes away from Biden. After 2024, he will probably do some good work in completely dismantling all vaccine programs, but we gotta wait and see.
I seriously doubt he "believes in climate change*. He may very well push such rhetoric, but to think he actually believes the rhetoric is ludicrous. No one at the top believes any of the shit they push.
I don't know about him being "anti 2nd amendment" either. I haven't heard him push that rhetoric (though I don't listen to him all that often). Regardless, he would be very much less divisive than Trump, which I think is very important. And again, I'm not suggesting it, I was asking what people thought about the divisiveness and how a reduction in that division would lead towards the GA.
I'm not at my computer (or at my house), nor will I be for a couple days. But off the top of my head:
There's more. Maybe I can look some stuff up when I get home.
Yeah pretty much the standard spiel, including the reddit theories from '16, like Trump indebted to Rothschild because Wilbur Ross used to work for Rothschilds, when in reality Trump did the opposite - he baited and shafted the Bankers with his banktruptcies, and that some anonymous poster claimed that Ivanka dated a Rothschild.
As for the symbolism, I guess only those who understand symbology a bit more in detail would realize that all the symbols Trump uses are reverse of the Cabal symbolism for a reason. Inverted pyramid. Inverted obelisk. The horns on the head actually dropping. These are all FU to the Cabal because these are their sacred symbols.
I supposed Kushnar reeks of Cabal because he is a Jew? I assume thats what you meant because you listed Ivanka being Jewish as well.
I hope you are keeping your eyes open even as we are learning the truth behind Zionists vs Jews. Kushner architected the Abraham Accords which was the setup for the current battleground where the deep state of both Israel and Palestine are being brought to the open.
I hope you paid attention to the IDF bombing Israelis and blaming it on Hamas.
Man, I was joking you might include this, didnt realize you actually included it with a straight face. All their trips were between Florida and NY, not the pedo island. Of course until he found out what Epstein did and kicked him out, and was the only one helped with the prosecution. Didn't really think I should give this refresher to an Anon!
Being dismissive doesn't make statements of fact untrue. This is pretty much the standard response from a True Believer. You don't know what really happened on any of the statements of fact, yet you have justified them all to fit your belief. I don't know what happened either, but I know there is damning evidence there. Hundreds of people on these boards have been crucified for far less.
He didn't just "used to work for Rothschilds," he worked for them for decades and was one of their top guys. He worked for them at the time of his helping Trump with his bond issue. He is himself deeply Cabal. Here is an article from 1992 that elaborates the relationship. Note it also mentions Stephen Bollenbach as Trump's go to guy to run his organization at the time. Bollenbach is deeply Cabal.
Provide evidence to support this statement. You can't "shaft the Bankers." It is impossible. That is not how the world works. No matter how something may appear on the surface, a deeper investigation proves The House Always Wins. The sequence of events from all period documentation I could find is, Trump was fucked. He got direct help from several agents of Rothschild and Rockefeller et al. He got out of trouble. He was thus indebted. However you have rectified that in your mind is on you. You must twist those facts to justify it. Regardless, I guarantee you, you cannot be further successful if you attempt to "screw over the banks."
Please read my report if you do not understand that statement.
Do you think I am doing my research on reddit? Give me a break. This stuff is all over the place. This happened before the anti-Trump media stuff was ever a thing. He was high society. That makes it easy to find these things. All you have to do is look, and restrict your search to before 2015. The only way to find anything is to restrict your search back to when Trump was liked by the media.
Here's a regular MSM article from 2011 that states it plainly. There are literally thousands of MSM articles that make the same claim going back to the 90s. It has never been refuted. It has only been denied by True Believers, despite the evidence.
If you think you have information regarding a thing, present your argument. Attacks on my knowledge, of which you know literally nothing, are similarly the types of dealing with cognitive dissonance expected from a True Believer. I feel my understanding of the symbology is quite substantial. Case in point.
The inverted pyramid is absolutely a sign of the Cabal. It is all over on their symbology. It is the other half of "As above, so below". However, this particular inverted pyramid, 6x6 and filled with trees, is a hallmark of the vagina of the godess of fertility, or Gaia's vagina, or Asherah's vagina. It is a symbol that goes back to predeluvian times (eon's ago), and has been prominent in archeologyl since. It exists in that form all over the world as well, not just through time.
There is nothing "inverted" about the obelisks, so I don't know what you are talking about. The obelisks come from the shadows of the protrusions. There are six of them, and they are about 500 feet tall. Once you see them, you can't miss them. They stand straight and tall.
I don't know what "drooping horns" you are talking about, but the Mithra symbolism is far worse, and you didn't address it at all.
You assume completely incorrect. I expected more of you. Do a dive into Kushner. It is very, very easy to find thousands of connections and indebtedness to the Cabal by family Kushner going back forever for any honest investigator. It literally takes five seconds. It is everywhere.
I listed Ivanka as being Jewish because being a Jew does have meaning in this war, even if it isn't necessarily the meaning that some think. It is an important point. On it's own, as just a statement of fact, it is insufficient, but with further context, which I didn't supply, but which many know, it becomes a point of consideration. A point of consideration is just one thing. By itself, it's just that thing. Along with a laundry list of other facts, it provides potentially important context.
Every single major event that has happened in the world for the past two centuries or more (all wars, great depression, etc.), has been an effort to fulfill prophecy regarding Jerusalem. Being Jewish is important, even if it isn't necessarily damning by itself.
NOTHING can be taken on surface level. NOTHING. Literally everyone I look into who is "on the other side" is controlled opposition, intentionally being "on the other side" specifically because someone has to be, thus be that side yourself. Suggesting that what we see on the surface is what is really happening is naive in the extreme.
It is absolutely damning evidence. Other than the statements of fact, I don't know what really happened. You don't know what really happened. All that we can say for sure is that it happened. You are dismissing and justifying it as you need to to affirm your True Beliefs. Trump and Epstein have been connected and explicitly stated as friends for decades. What the truth is there, who knows. Assuming you know the truth is again, naive. All the world's a stage. Quite simply, you cannot become a player, unless you are compromised. Period. Everyone who is anyone has to do some very naughty things. Trump was a major player for decades, with deep ties to numerous Cabal agents. His entire empire would not exist without their aid. And that's just on the surface. Who knows what he had to do to make it.
If you read my report it is painfully clear that my statements of requirement to be successful on that level require making a deal with the devil. It is the only possible way.
Everyone who is anyone has made a deal with the devil.
Period.
The problem I find with people making arguments such as you are doing is that they present vague connections and make vague deductions, and yet when presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.
So lets take a step back. Start with defining what "making a deal with the devil" means, according to you. Then provide "damning evidences" for that claim. For instance if you claim Trump is "indebted to Rothschilds" - provide evidence that he is indeed indebted to them - not deductions based on who helped him, and what you can and cannot do to the Bankers, but the damning evidence that shows that he is "indebted to them".
If you claim any symbology proves that he made the "deal with the devil", provide the pictures of the said symbols, and share your wisdom with good references to the same symbols and what they represent beyond being initiated into esoteric knowledge, and how it proves "making the deal with the devil"
If you claim that flying with Epsteins between US cities is damning evidence that he made a "deal with the devil", provide proof that he fully understood what Epstein was doing and took part in those activities.
Explain in clear terms exactly what you think is implied by someone being a Jew as far as "making deal with the devil", and how having relatives who are Jews provides "damning evidence" that he made the deal with the devil.
I think this would be a good start.
I hope your "damning evidences" are a bit more than a one line claim in a footnote of some MSM article.
You’ll get more traction for this over at consumeproduct.win
Everybody of any importance that Epstein could obtain contact information on was in his book. I have numbers in my own phone list of people who I couldn't pick out of a lineup. They are there for various reasons, definitely not for friendship or crime planning purposes. In other words, the address book is pretty useless as evidence of anything at all.
Trump threw Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago.