In Few if Any Situations does Evidence and Logic Speak Louder or More Clearly !!! 🤔👍👍
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Logically, if Q was not really part of Trump's inner circle but still useful in accomplishing what Trump ultimately wants to do, he would neither fully embrace nor disavow Q. He could end it if he had to. Then again, maybe he couldn't. "Disinformation is necessary."
Your logic is good but still I think there is ample proof that Trump is coordinating closely with the Q team. He was "invited" to run, had military behind him at his inauguration, don't forget the "calm before the storm" photo op with the military top brass, and the fact that Trump and Q used to post the exact same misspelled word or catch phrase within one second of each other to prove they were coordinating.
Trump and Q used to post the exact same misspelled word or catch phrase within one second of each other
Have you confused the very close deltas (i.le. one second and others) with the use of similar or same phrases used at different times. E.g With "Tippy top", there were many days between the request and the delivery.
If my memory is correct, the very close deltas were NOT couched in exact same mispellings or phrases, but rather dealt, with plausible deniability, very similar or related topics, themes, etc, such that there was still plausible deniability, except that on the part of Q, the timing eventually proved to be statistically (virtually) impossibly driven by 'chance'.
Then, there were various nods and winks and connections between drops and tweets or words by potus, but in those cases, the close deltas were not the factor.
I would have to check back on the exact nature of the deltas I referenced. It could be my memory is conflating some things.
Well, its been five years, so my memory may well be skewed as well. Either way, the deltas PLUS the incidental conflux of phrases, topics and other point powerfully to the Q operations connection with DJT.
He fully embraces it.
Not overtly. He still maintains plausible deniability. There are lots of die-hard Trump supporters who don't believe in Q.
That is very true. He embraces it as much as he can legally.