I can see potential for her to be a controlled opposition agent. Though that would likely put her as a slow burn operative that ends up being made to look like an unreliable nut job in the end.
Her claims seem like this to the normies who I have heard that have seen her videos. Her info/ideas she spouses could easily backfire for the great awakening if things do not turn out the way she claims.
That is if she is a black hat/controlled & blackhats are claiming ground.
I could be wrong, and I often am, I thought the term was "Fantastic", which is generally considered good by society. Though there are some things that are too fantastical to be believed.
He also praised the accomplishments of RBG & while I agree she was a very accomplished woman, & it can be sad to see loss of life, I don't believe that many of her supreme court decisions & positions were great.
I am not certain which way to lean with her, though she certainly is a catalyst of some sort.
She seems like a pay-triot to me. Your concern is shared.
I can see potential for her to be a controlled opposition agent. Though that would likely put her as a slow burn operative that ends up being made to look like an unreliable nut job in the end.
Her claims seem like this to the normies who I have heard that have seen her videos. Her info/ideas she spouses could easily backfire for the great awakening if things do not turn out the way she claims.
That is if she is a black hat/controlled & blackhats are claiming ground.
Trump said she was great, so I doubt she's a black hat.
I could be wrong, and I often am, I thought the term was "Fantastic", which is generally considered good by society. Though there are some things that are too fantastical to be believed.
He also praised the accomplishments of RBG & while I agree she was a very accomplished woman, & it can be sad to see loss of life, I don't believe that many of her supreme court decisions & positions were great.
I am not certain which way to lean with her, though she certainly is a catalyst of some sort.