Really? I believe Trumps position has been rather open, and realistic to the nations original values, mainly: A right to privacy and self determination.
All these issues are caused by the gov poking its nose into the business, and bedrooms of honest citizens - the gov has no right to define marriage, or police it. To determine what is and what isn’t religious, etc.
If people want to support faggotry, it’s their business. Just as it’s the right of people to boycott those advocates. No business should be forced to have queer bathrooms, or bathrooms of any type at all.
And I believe strongly in your rate to hate queers-if that’s your position. As long as you don’t harm them. The gov should limit themselves to doing their job which is to protect their citizens, and their inalienable rights...not their feelings.
"Personal autonomy is a good thing within limits, an important component of human dignity and happiness, but clinging to personal autonomy to justify continued behaviors and policies which ultimately erode society by unraveling the fabric of marriage and family life – and which have led to the un-defining of man and woman, husband and wife, boy and girl, son and daughter – is to collaborate with objective evil.
This is a message many of us do not want to hear. But it is a message we need to hear. Hopefully it’s one each of us can begin to consider, then embrace. The future of our country and the western world depends on it.
There is no rationale – NONE – for acknowledging or surrendering to a law that enshrines something evil that is not real, that does not actually exist, and can never come to be. Homosexual “marriage” is not a real thing; It is an unserious thing."
I contend that it is essential to the foundation of our country to esteem the Biblical principles of marriage and family life which includes only two sexes, marriage and family. A society which gives everyone whatever their heart desires will never work. There has to be a foundational moral code that limits the moral freedoms that tend to decay and destroy a society. A free society certainly does NOT mean everyone is free to do whatever they want.
Really? I believe Trumps position has been rather open, and realistic to the nations original values, mainly: A right to privacy and self determination.
All these issues are caused by the gov poking its nose into the business, and bedrooms of honest citizens - the gov has no right to define marriage, or police it. To determine what is and what isn’t religious, etc.
If people want to support faggotry, it’s their business. Just as it’s the right of people to boycott those advocates. No business should be forced to have queer bathrooms, or bathrooms of any type at all.
And I believe strongly in your rate to hate queers-if that’s your position. As long as you don’t harm them. The gov should limit themselves to doing their job which is to protect their citizens, and their inalienable rights...not their feelings.
"Personal autonomy is a good thing within limits, an important component of human dignity and happiness, but clinging to personal autonomy to justify continued behaviors and policies which ultimately erode society by unraveling the fabric of marriage and family life – and which have led to the un-defining of man and woman, husband and wife, boy and girl, son and daughter – is to collaborate with objective evil.
This is a message many of us do not want to hear. But it is a message we need to hear. Hopefully it’s one each of us can begin to consider, then embrace. The future of our country and the western world depends on it.
There is no rationale – NONE – for acknowledging or surrendering to a law that enshrines something evil that is not real, that does not actually exist, and can never come to be. Homosexual “marriage” is not a real thing; It is an unserious thing."
I contend that it is essential to the foundation of our country to esteem the Biblical principles of marriage and family life which includes only two sexes, marriage and family. A society which gives everyone whatever their heart desires will never work. There has to be a foundational moral code that limits the moral freedoms that tend to decay and destroy a society. A free society certainly does NOT mean everyone is free to do whatever they want.
Still cant find his actual speech, because thats the only thing that tells us what his position is.