I am one who think the toaster who bludgeon Clinton's friend to death is smarter than the friend, but moon landing, always seem a little fake to me. I did ask several questions about that and didn't get any good answers.
You have to be thoughtful about what a "good answer" is. Any truthful answer is a good answer. If you are not in a position to know the answer beforehand, you may have a problem if it conflicts with "common sense." In this case, common sense is mostly ignorant expectations and prejudice. (People actually scoffed at Robert Goddard's contention that one could use rockets in a vacuum. "How could it work if there is no air to push against?" Seems reasonable---but is totally ignorant of how a rocket works.) It will be necessary to accept answers that have nothing to do with your "common sense," because your common sense is the result of having no answers. The way to get over that is to continue to ask questions, and read up on the founding subject matter.
I am one who think the toaster who bludgeon Clinton's friend to death is smarter than the friend, but moon landing, always seem a little fake to me. I did ask several questions about that and didn't get any good answers.
My other offer stands, so I won't repeat it here.
You have to be thoughtful about what a "good answer" is. Any truthful answer is a good answer. If you are not in a position to know the answer beforehand, you may have a problem if it conflicts with "common sense." In this case, common sense is mostly ignorant expectations and prejudice. (People actually scoffed at Robert Goddard's contention that one could use rockets in a vacuum. "How could it work if there is no air to push against?" Seems reasonable---but is totally ignorant of how a rocket works.) It will be necessary to accept answers that have nothing to do with your "common sense," because your common sense is the result of having no answers. The way to get over that is to continue to ask questions, and read up on the founding subject matter.