True, but that makes sense in the context of OCR (Optical Character Recognition), you can visually see how that would be the case, and would provide cover saying it was just an OCR error.
Polsi to Pelosi, I'm not seeing that. That is all I am saying. Not saying it's nothing, just that it's not very convincing to me.
And just to clarify what I mean by "You can visually see how that would be the case":
I mean the letters "rn" is very close to "m" in terms of OCR. You can easily see how an OCR system could misread "rn" as "m". Then even if that was done on purpose you could just say "The OCR system messed up"
True, but that makes sense in the context of OCR (Optical Character Recognition), you can visually see how that would be the case, and would provide cover saying it was just an OCR error.
Polsi to Pelosi, I'm not seeing that. That is all I am saying. Not saying it's nothing, just that it's not very convincing to me.
And just to clarify what I mean by "You can visually see how that would be the case":
I mean the letters "rn" is very close to "m" in terms of OCR. You can easily see how an OCR system could misread "rn" as "m". Then even if that was done on purpose you could just say "The OCR system messed up"