Steve Kirsch’s MIT talk on 11/30 (he starts around 24 mins):
https://rumble.com/v3yovx4-vsrf-live-104-exclusive-mit-speech-by-steve-kirsch.html
The latest 4 articles on Kirsch’s substack are all on this topic:
https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios
Igor Chudov’s analysis of the data:
Professor Norman Fenton’s response (he is referenced in Kirsch’s MIT talk):
What exactly is the reason for suspecting poisoned well? Any specific red flags or are you thinking “too good to be true” in general?
Chudov has major concerns with the numbers presented on screen in the whistle blower video regards the 118 batches in the dataset. Batch 1 and 7 in the dataset he was given didn't correlate with the figures shown by the whislteblower. His data showed an increase in numbers vaxxed in these two batches with a corresponding number of more deaths but at a lower overall percent death rate that the figures shown on the video.
So the rest of the Batches actually tallied? That would be a huge confirmation that this guy is not making up random numbers.
The NZ Ministry of Health are not denying the dataset is real. In fact they are prosecuting the Whistleblower for unauthorized use and dissemination. Chudov has only so far analyzed the batches 1 and 7 as far as I can see and has concerns.