Haha. Okay, I will answer each of your (already asked and answered) poor arguments, later when i have time to do ao.
but first, the very idea that God could be immoral showed a flawed perception of the nature of God.
your "morality" is admittedly not objective, so in your world view, Hitler didn't do anything objectively wrong, it just wrong to you, in the current age of society. If someone were to steal an infant, rape them, eat them alive, and shit on the remains it would not be objectively bad, in fact, in your world view. It's possible that it could be subjectively good and right.
in a world without objective morality everything is permissible.
Your argument is that god cannot be wrong therefore no matter what god does it is moral. You are the one who justifies killing babies as god is supposed to have done in your fictional book you actually believe is real. You said it yourself: What is wrong with that? I say there is a natural human morality that says that is wrong. You say if god does it it is right yet you accuse me of having no standard of morality. So not only do you justify unfathomable evil you double down and accuse me of what you do. Big time fuckin' loser!
For the sake of argument. I'm just going to give you everything, I will (falsely) say sure God says kill babies. You have no moral ground to say that's wrong.
You see, you actually can't answer why any of your argument mean anything morally. Don't you see that? You complain about immorality but can't even justify your position.
Have you ever debated a flat-earther over science? And how they have a long list of arguments expecting thorough answers but each argument Is built from ignorance? This is what it's like for me right now.
I have and it is like arguing with a cult member such as you. You claim to subscribe to an objective moral code written by god but when god violates his own law to the maximum you say he can do no wrong. I have appreciated posts by you in the past. Not this twisted cult-logic though. You even base your moral superiority on being objective. It's subjective to the max to you and you can't see that because you are deep into a cult. You just say "Oh, you just don't understand Master. That's why you are having a problem."
Listen to yourself, you are using my religious texts. thats my domain not yours, But when I say your view is flawed, talking about MY OWN RELIGION, it's like it goes right over your head and you can't see how someone who is way outside of context and deep thought of the subject making claims which are rooted in shallow understanding, could possibly be wrong about the premise. Let alone, that your world view STILL doesn't actually make any of your arguments against Christianity valid. You try to maintain something as immoral when you admit nothing is truelly immoral and it's all opinion.
Haha. Okay, I will answer each of your (already asked and answered) poor arguments, later when i have time to do ao.
Your argument is that god cannot be wrong therefore no matter what god does it is moral. You are the one who justifies killing babies as god is supposed to have done in your fictional book you actually believe is real. You said it yourself: What is wrong with that? I say there is a natural human morality that says that is wrong. You say if god does it it is right yet you accuse me of having no standard of morality. So not only do you justify unfathomable evil you double down and accuse me of what you do. Big time fuckin' loser!
For the sake of argument. I'm just going to give you everything, I will (falsely) say sure God says kill babies. You have no moral ground to say that's wrong.
Looo-ser!
You see, you actually can't answer why any of your argument mean anything morally. Don't you see that? You complain about immorality but can't even justify your position.
Have you ever debated a flat-earther over science? And how they have a long list of arguments expecting thorough answers but each argument Is built from ignorance? This is what it's like for me right now.
I have and it is like arguing with a cult member such as you. You claim to subscribe to an objective moral code written by god but when god violates his own law to the maximum you say he can do no wrong. I have appreciated posts by you in the past. Not this twisted cult-logic though. You even base your moral superiority on being objective. It's subjective to the max to you and you can't see that because you are deep into a cult. You just say "Oh, you just don't understand Master. That's why you are having a problem."
Listen to yourself, you are using my religious texts. thats my domain not yours, But when I say your view is flawed, talking about MY OWN RELIGION, it's like it goes right over your head and you can't see how someone who is way outside of context and deep thought of the subject making claims which are rooted in shallow understanding, could possibly be wrong about the premise. Let alone, that your world view STILL doesn't actually make any of your arguments against Christianity valid. You try to maintain something as immoral when you admit nothing is truelly immoral and it's all opinion.