Q and the anons CODE OF ETHICS
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
I knew from day one of seeing and hearing Qanon like it was the same as Q, that sooner or later it would all mush together so much that regular people would accept the two as the same. Why wouldn't the difference between someone who is an anon who follows Q, and someone being a "Qanon", not completely confuse? Of course it does. It doesn't solve anything to say "no such thing as Qanon" there IS a Qanon whether we like it or not. So how do we boomerang it and make it work FOR us? Get them at their own game. Anons should completely infiltrate and restate the messages.
Another important point is that if someone like a normie tried searching for simply the letter “Q” as the totality of their keyword search, they’d spend forever trying to actually find one of the Q-related boards online.
I think Q had a very good reason for separating from anon. We are after all, at war. We should do as requested. But not freak out when we see the earlier reference.