That’s for the history lesson but, I wasn’t talking about 1930’s Nazi Germany, I was using it as a metaphor for what’s going on here. Ok smarty pants, let me give u another scenario. Congress and the senate passes a law that Lizard people can eat humans at will, everyone laughs because it such a stupid law and “can’t happen”. The next day every politician in the US sheds their skin and it’s revealed they are lizard people and start eating people. Let’s say in this hypothetical scenario 100% of the military are non Lizard people. Would they throw up their hands and go “u voted for this”. 😂 Also do you not think they are shredding the constitution now?
Again in your example, the cops, the courts, etc go along with the lizard people eating humans. And the Constitution somehow covers some other species. That's a little far fetched to me.
My larger point is having a military faithful to their oath is a barrier against tyranny.
It's clearly illegal for the military to start arresting people. I don't think the parallels with Nazi Germany go in the same directions. The round up and detain people would MUCH MORE likely happen against an unpopular minority.....see the Japanese in WWII.
That’s for the history lesson but, I wasn’t talking about 1930’s Nazi Germany, I was using it as a metaphor for what’s going on here. Ok smarty pants, let me give u another scenario. Congress and the senate passes a law that Lizard people can eat humans at will, everyone laughs because it such a stupid law and “can’t happen”. The next day every politician in the US sheds their skin and it’s revealed they are lizard people and start eating people. Let’s say in this hypothetical scenario 100% of the military are non Lizard people. Would they throw up their hands and go “u voted for this”. 😂 Also do you not think they are shredding the constitution now?
Gee, another relevant example.
Again in your example, the cops, the courts, etc go along with the lizard people eating humans. And the Constitution somehow covers some other species. That's a little far fetched to me.
My larger point is having a military faithful to their oath is a barrier against tyranny.
So the first scenario isn’t relevant?
I don't think it's realistic.
It's clearly illegal for the military to start arresting people. I don't think the parallels with Nazi Germany go in the same directions. The round up and detain people would MUCH MORE likely happen against an unpopular minority.....see the Japanese in WWII.