Q made a statement that the children will unite the people. I am actually rather skeptical of this. I know images of fully developed aborted babies does nothing to change the hearts of the pro abortion bunch.
There are many children that have been taken hostage by Hamas and Pro Palestine people will tear these children's pictures from the walls.
On the other side, there are endless videos of crying injured Palestinian children shown on TV and I have seen many comments from the Pro Israeli side saying "they are not innocent. They are Palestinian. They should all be killed."
Sorry for my pessimism, but I feel the hope that images of trafficked children may ultimately unite the people seems a little naive. I'm hoping to be more optimistic about this, but my observation is that tribalism always comes in first place.
Hope someone can convince me otherwise.
this is a great post and is pretty much what I think as well. Of course, we can quibble with the numbers.
What is the plan to even attempt to get this scandalous child-harming information out to everyone in a way they will believe? Is there any way to avoid a solid 30-40% simply disbelieving it, even if it were presented on national television by a worldwide military general contigent? That's another problem. WHO is going to present this information?
I've been under the impression that our job in all of this mostly to assess. We assess the information laid before us. How insidious is the enemy, are they willing to plant whistleblowers with disinfo to make us look like we're crazy? Absolutely. So our first job as a group is to sort through the noise and then figure out how to present information to those in our lives. Or at least that is what I believe we are supposed to have been doing for the past several years. By dropping hints here and there to our friends, family, and acquaintances, we are pushing the movement forward as a whole.
Most of the time, this site is anywhere from 2 months to 2 years ahead of the curve. Sometimes the information comes out and it gets ignored, but I think that's just part of how society works. The more stuff that comes out, the harder it is for people to ignore the fact that we've been consistently ahead of the curve. So, I believe that, whether we've seen the fruits of our labor or not, we, as a community, have primed a decent portion of the population for the beginnings of what I can only assume will be more and more information dropping.
I'm fairly optimistic, I believe that 30-40% of the country would openly admit to being, at the very least, willing to give the Q movement a chance if they felt that they could answer that question 1. without anyone else's knowledge and 2. without any repercussions. From my own experience, if I mention the goals of Q, a lot of people are on board as long as I don't use too many "buzzwords" or identifying words that make them feel like Q is actually involved in said goal. The media and the cabal have done a wonderful job of smearing the public opinion on this whole movement. I'd wager that there is another 10-20% who would be on board if they could see more proof of what we all already know. I think these people are only weeks to months away from being essentially on our side. After that, once people start realizing that the majority are in favor of the movement, I think we will see a quick change of pace and public opinion. As to the exact numbers on how many will ultimately reject what is right in front of them? I'd hope that it is less than 10%, but I could see it being as high as 25%. Now, that 25% will likely shrink pretty fast as I think a good deal of that group will end up in jail. Not that I necessarily think that many people are involved in the despicable practices of the cabal, but I think the cabal lets gangs and criminals get away with far more than we even realize, so I do think that the downfall of the cabal is also the downfall of a large portion organized and unorganized crime.
In short, people may not believe in the worst of the crimes at first. Which is understandable. Thus, we take stock in what we know about these people. Take Joe Biden for example. 1. Clearly he is willing to plagiarize to get his way, even the media admitted this back in the 80s. 2. Makes racist and bigoted statements on a consistent basis. 3. Likes to get weirdly close to women and often appears to smell them. 4. Has a lot of shady family business connections. 5. Has made political threats 6. Is creepily handsy with children. 7. Daughter's diary talks about showers with her father and says (probably not appropriate), the diary also says the whole family is sexually charged, even at young and not appropriate ages. 8. Hunter's laptop, at the very least, implies a lot of disgusting dirt on him and "The Big Guy"
Some of the numbers can be interchangeable, but if you can get people to admit to the smaller more obvious issue about a Joe Biden type, it becomes easier to establish the larger more problematic issues. I believe it is our job to prove that which is obvious and show that the greater crimes are not just possible, but heavily implied (hence why I used Hunter's laptop, it doesn't directly state that the Bidens are committing these atrocities, but it does lay down the groundwork for people to see that there is a pattern of problematic behavior by the entire family, which will allow the Q team (or the military or whomever) to produce the final evidence at whatever later date is necessary. Again, I believe our job is just to get the people around us primed so that when that portion of the plan moves forward, they are willing to see that these people are potentially highly problematic people. Some in our circles will be completely open to it, others to varying degrees. The more we get them open to the idea, the easier it is for that part of the plan to move forward.