I disagree that in this case (same base, same month, same work) it wouldn’t happen pretty often, unless there is a correlation. Thus the speculation it was the jab.
Well, like I said, you and I know nothing about the cause of death. Sometimes articles will list a cause, but other times they won't, so it makes no sense just assuming. Meaning, they could have found these soldiers dead by some other clear means, like a suicide, so there'd be no need for an autopsy to look for clotting.
I disagree that in this case (same base, same month, same work) it wouldn’t happen pretty often, unless there is a correlation. Thus the speculation it was the jab.
So then we agree, because I included that in my comment as being less often.
This doesn't mean that there is a correlation. Furthermore, there is no listed cause of death. You don't know if these are cardiac events or not.
Again, don't succumb to the "It's unlikely that this would happen so then it must be impossible" belief
How about some autopsies? Like for clots?
Well, like I said, you and I know nothing about the cause of death. Sometimes articles will list a cause, but other times they won't, so it makes no sense just assuming. Meaning, they could have found these soldiers dead by some other clear means, like a suicide, so there'd be no need for an autopsy to look for clotting.