Bootsie, Krispy and Birdy are all placed by the deepstate the very who also took Trump out of the ballot. Prove us wrong by following Vivek's actions.
Trump already discredited all the 3 after the last GOP debate. He explicitly quoted Vivek had won the debate (- for those Vivek haters in this forum) and never criticized him. So far Vivek has been saying right and beautiful things as well as taking right actions. Hope he stays consistent in the time to come and doesn't get compromised on the way. Of course, there is no reason to vote for him while Trump is still running. That's absurd. Some of us think he is only a red piller for the time being and will fold and yield to Trump later.
I do hear "oh.. what about Obama quotes?"... is it possible that he wanted to win the sheeple by quoting what was already accepted phrase during early campaigns? Obama was a great orator, most of us fell for him. Perhaps some of his sentences sunk into Vivek's subconscious and came out automatically? Past doesn't define the person, present actions do.
I disagree with calling people "Vivek haters", because whenever someone says "hater" it sounds whiny and petulant -- no offense.
I think people are just rightfully distrusting now, which I would consider a good thing up until they say they won't vote for Trump if he picks X/Y/Z candidate, then they are the ones being whiny and petulant.
I agree past doesn't define a person, that's a huge part of growing and moving forward. But it does make people right to distrust.
Distrusting is one thing, calling names and issuing strong unjust statements about him is another thing. I disagree on your judgement on being whiny and petulant too. Because it was an objective observation based on the comments issued on this forum. Not taking it back. Calling it what it is.
Bootsie, Krispy and Birdy are all placed by the deepstate the very who also took Trump out of the ballot. Prove us wrong by following Vivek's actions.
Trump already discredited all the 3 after the last GOP debate. He explicitly quoted Vivek had won the debate (- for those Vivek haters in this forum) and never criticized him. So far Vivek has been saying right and beautiful things as well as taking right actions. Hope he stays consistent in the time to come and doesn't get compromised on the way. Of course, there is no reason to vote for him while Trump is still running. That's absurd. Some of us think he is only a red piller for the time being and will fold and yield to Trump later.
I do hear "oh.. what about Obama quotes?"... is it possible that he wanted to win the sheeple by quoting what was already accepted phrase during early campaigns? Obama was a great orator, most of us fell for him. Perhaps some of his sentences sunk into Vivek's subconscious and came out automatically? Past doesn't define the person, present actions do.
I disagree with calling people "Vivek haters", because whenever someone says "hater" it sounds whiny and petulant -- no offense.
I think people are just rightfully distrusting now, which I would consider a good thing up until they say they won't vote for Trump if he picks X/Y/Z candidate, then they are the ones being whiny and petulant.
I agree past doesn't define a person, that's a huge part of growing and moving forward. But it does make people right to distrust.
Distrusting is one thing, calling names and issuing strong unjust statements about him is another thing. I disagree on your judgement on being whiny and petulant too. Because it was an objective observation based on the comments issued on this forum. Not taking it back. Calling it what it is.