Seems ironic that the article headline draws a conclusion (aka "the narrative") based on no evidence obviously to promote the narrative, and steers clear of the many serious investigations seeking answers about serious concerns based on serious observations. What a waste of ones and zeros.
Seems ironic that the article headline draws a conclusion (aka "the narrative") based on no evidence obviously to promote the narrative, and steers clear of the many serious investigations seeking answers about serious concerns based on serious observations. What a waste of ones and zeros.