probably because you cant prove anyone who vacationed on his island was a "client" of his and actively procured a child. unless you have those transaction records. but we all know what that island was used for and anyone who was there should be presumed as a client
probably because you cant prove anyone who vacationed on his island was a "client" of his and actively procured a child. unless you have those transaction records. but we all know what that island was used for and anyone who was there should be presumed as a client