The U.S. has put sanctions on other countries for doing exactly what the Colorado Supreme Court has done today.
(www.dailysignal.com)
'DO AS WE SAY- NOT AS WE DO!'
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law[1] that empowers the president of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.
The act provides a “statutory exception” to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States.[2][3]
Before invoking the powers under the Act, 10 U.S.C. § 254 requires the President to first publish a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse. As part of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, these provisions have since been amended.
A presidential proclamation is a statement issued by a US president on an issue of public policy and is a type of presidential directive. ]
A presidential proclamation is an instrument that:
states a condition, declares a law and requires obedience, recognizes an event, or triggers the implementation of a law, by recognizing that the circumstances described in the law have been realized.[1]
This was all cited with links https://x22report.com/the-real-insurrectionist-are-now-being-exposed-nobody-is-above-the-law-ep-3241/ ... scroll down... I hate that links get lost with a cut and paste on this win site but not most others...
Rich Baris "The People's Pundit" @Peoples_Pundit · Dec 20 But just to be clear, you don't believe in due process outlined in the 14th Amendment, and you don't acknowledge the fact it omits the Office of the President, and you don't acknowledge the part where the President is the only one who declares an "insurrection" etc. etc. etc. wmcgurn @wmcgurn1959 ~ Congress amended section 3 of the 14th Amendment twice: 1870 & 1948 to show the Judicial branch how it was to be applied. "1948: Congress replaced the 1870 statute with a criminal insurrection law, 18 U.S.C. § 2383. If convicted under that statute -- with full criminal due process afforded the defendant -- one of the punishments is to be banned from holding office in the United States. Trump has not been charged under this statute."
https://twitter.com/wmcgurn1959/status/1737856755047305531
An amicus brief https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf has been filed in the SCOTUS by former Attorney General Ed Meese (under Ronald Reagan), and two constitutional law professors, Steven Calabresi and Gary S. Lawson, challenging the legality altogether of Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel for prosecuting Mr. Trump. The amicus is filed in the matter of Jack Smith’s certiorari petition to the court to schedule Mr. Trump’s DC trial the same day as the Super Tuesday primary —against the defendant’s objections. The amicus presents compelling arguments that Attorney General Merrick Garland acted illegally in appointing Mr. Smith, and if SCOTUS chucks him out of the special counsel job, the whole mendaciously constructed scaffold of the Jan 6 prosecution goes out the window, along with the Mar-a-Lago documents case.
I love the mendaciously constructed scaffold going out the window part.
That's what trump did.