Although I understand the tit-for-tat logic, the end-game will be that there will be states who ban one candidate, posited against states who ban another. So, that's OK, I suppose, because it will even up, provided there is some sort of balance, i.e., there are enough electoral college votes on each side of the isle to support such shenanigans.
However, it appears, if the swing-state Republicans get their way, that Colorado is already up against three swing states. How many electoral college votes are we talking about, on each side? And how will it look if all the states offer a pruned list?
In any case, taking a candidate off the ballot is depriving the long-suffering state's population of choices, or pre-deciding the results, if you like. So I am not sure how Colorado Republicans, or indeed those swing-state Democrats, and possibly others, are going to react to all this.
Although I understand the tit-for-tat logic, the end-game will be that there will be states who ban one candidate, posited against states who ban another. So, that's OK, I suppose, because it will even up, provided there is some sort of balance, i.e., there are enough electoral college votes on each side of the isle to support such shenanigans.
However, it appears, if the swing-state Republicans get their way, that Colorado is already up against three swing states. How many electoral college votes are we talking about, on each side? And how will it look if all the states offer a pruned list?
In any case, taking a candidate off the ballot is depriving the long-suffering state's population of choices, or pre-deciding the results, if you like. So I am not sure how Colorado Republicans, or indeed those swing-state Democrats, and possibly others, are going to react to all this.
Ah. Accelerationism.
Carry on.