Good move. But I noticed that you just posted a 2 and a half year old clip that is full of viral narrative points that's not, as far as I can see, supported by evidence outside of the obvious biases that those waking up have.
Can I suggest you give a bit more attention to quality over quantity? I mean, if you vet what you post more instead of just grabbing it and posting it because it sounds good or sounds right?
(I don't mean to necessarily assume that this is what you do, and if you do vet what you post extensively, then obviously, keep at it. sorry to say it, however, it just looks like you do not very carefully vet what you post, so it can be a lot of hit and miss. Your post on the vax doctor seems like quite good information, but your post on King's comments 92.5 years old) doesn't.)
Well, the issue of whether virus actually exist or not is a controversy, and as far as I know, there is evidence on both sides. I don't know that you can state that its been proven one way or the other.
The 'covid virus' has never been isolated narrative was spawned NOT by someone saying no viruses have ever been isolated (aka they don't exist) but rather on a completely different basis.
That could be an argument for a long time about virus existence. Now as for me, Covid virus is a mix between flu and cold. I have been treating it using homeopathic and it works.
Personally, I think (my working belief is) there was a released virus, that it was engineered by Fauci, that it was no where near as deadly as they wanted, and that in a LOT of cases, it was NOT there, but instead, what was essentially the flu was labeled and treated as if it were the engineered covid virus.
Fundamentally, I never got tested and I would refuse to get tested. Someone in my family had what was a very strange ailment with symptoms that were not normally found by the flu, but whether this was covid or not, I don't know and don't really care.
Perhaps like you, I'm confident that 90%+ of what was labeled covid19 was in fact simply the flu. In certain places, certainly in my own country.
But I'll admit, I don't really care much about c19 as a virus, but I do care a LOT about how information is shared here at GAW, the quality of the information and the general mentality that is either developed and fostered here or not. That's also because I saw how manipulation of information was so destructive during the whole 20/21 'pandemic'.
Much more than disease, information, how it is handled, processed (or not), and how people leave the matrix - that's far more important for humanity in my opinion.
(that's why I'm constantly alert to and suspicious of fake information sources and manipulation of information (ie. headlines) by groups, organizations and individuals in the so-called 'truth sphere'.
MSM news is pretty easy to filter - we know what they try to do. But 'alt-media' is much, much harder, they will often exploit known alt-news to promote their own agenda and narratives. So it requires more effort, imo.
Of course, everyone's approach is a little different, so I'll just share my comments as I see them. Hopefully, they are helpful.
Good move. But I noticed that you just posted a 2 and a half year old clip that is full of viral narrative points that's not, as far as I can see, supported by evidence outside of the obvious biases that those waking up have.
Can I suggest you give a bit more attention to quality over quantity? I mean, if you vet what you post more instead of just grabbing it and posting it because it sounds good or sounds right?
(I don't mean to necessarily assume that this is what you do, and if you do vet what you post extensively, then obviously, keep at it. sorry to say it, however, it just looks like you do not very carefully vet what you post, so it can be a lot of hit and miss. Your post on the vax doctor seems like quite good information, but your post on King's comments 92.5 years old) doesn't.)
Biggest fraud against humanity-the viruses never been isolated. https://twitter.com/Miriam31932023/status/1737942429095940354
https://twitter.com/ViroLIEgy/status/1737840466396389449
https://twitter.com/edwardcholmes/status/1737667457588904278/photo/1
Well, the issue of whether virus actually exist or not is a controversy, and as far as I know, there is evidence on both sides. I don't know that you can state that its been proven one way or the other.
The 'covid virus' has never been isolated narrative was spawned NOT by someone saying no viruses have ever been isolated (aka they don't exist) but rather on a completely different basis.
That could be an argument for a long time about virus existence. Now as for me, Covid virus is a mix between flu and cold. I have been treating it using homeopathic and it works.
Hence, Covid is just that.
Personally, I think (my working belief is) there was a released virus, that it was engineered by Fauci, that it was no where near as deadly as they wanted, and that in a LOT of cases, it was NOT there, but instead, what was essentially the flu was labeled and treated as if it were the engineered covid virus.
Fundamentally, I never got tested and I would refuse to get tested. Someone in my family had what was a very strange ailment with symptoms that were not normally found by the flu, but whether this was covid or not, I don't know and don't really care.
Perhaps like you, I'm confident that 90%+ of what was labeled covid19 was in fact simply the flu. In certain places, certainly in my own country.
But I'll admit, I don't really care much about c19 as a virus, but I do care a LOT about how information is shared here at GAW, the quality of the information and the general mentality that is either developed and fostered here or not. That's also because I saw how manipulation of information was so destructive during the whole 20/21 'pandemic'.
Much more than disease, information, how it is handled, processed (or not), and how people leave the matrix - that's far more important for humanity in my opinion.
(that's why I'm constantly alert to and suspicious of fake information sources and manipulation of information (ie. headlines) by groups, organizations and individuals in the so-called 'truth sphere'.
MSM news is pretty easy to filter - we know what they try to do. But 'alt-media' is much, much harder, they will often exploit known alt-news to promote their own agenda and narratives. So it requires more effort, imo.
Of course, everyone's approach is a little different, so I'll just share my comments as I see them. Hopefully, they are helpful.