Michelle Obama 1994 voter reg card proves he is a man.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Sure. There is no way this document is doctored or fake at all. /s
Believe what you want, but don't fall victim to confirmation bias.
I mean, if he's a dude, pretending to be a woman, living as a woman, why on EARTH would he register his vote card as a male? But no, he spent his whole life since adulthood as a female (married Barry in 1992, apparently), then WHY would he/she register as a male in 1994?
Unless she were openly trans, and then everyone would know about it. But still, was male/male marriage legal in 1992? (I think not.) So...... join the dots.
No, this voter registration card is NOT suspect at all. No. /s
(This comment makes no claims regarding M Obama being female or male, but simply intends to point out the extremely low threshold of credibility to a 'voter registration card' posted on the internet as 'evidence'.)
OK. I'm a skeptic at heart. I admit it. But in the interest of due diligence, the sauce of the voter card is quoted as Joel Gilbert, who apparently wrote a book about Obama.
https://www.everand.com/book/584750384/Michelle-Obama-2024-Her-Real-Life-Story-and-Plan-for-Power
But I still need a lot more evidence before I accept some random image on the internet as factual evidence. Sorry. being raised in a world created by fake information has made me skeptical of LOTS of information, regardless of where it is coming from and ESPECIALLY when it appeals directly to my biases.
Note: A net search of Joel Gilbert + Obama + Transexual yields ZERO results with all three together. If Joel Gilbert had actually FOI-ed this voter card and published it or shared it in any way, would results not show even something of that?
Addendum: Gateway Pundit article by Roger Stone doing a review of Gilbert's book:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/roger-stone-reviews-new-documentary-michelle-obama-2024-real-life-story-plan-power/
This is how to discern. Everything you have written is spot on. I would add:
“net search”: not to be confused with the infinitive “to google”, should involve triangulation of multiple sources, not always search engines
“FOIA’d”: a disinfo / distraction device used to give a semblance of probity in matters of free speech and exculpatory evidence, once a reliable tool of Liberty but now used for limited hangouts by corrupted courts, corrupted intelligence officials and criminal politicians or opposition researchers