I've heard the same from Jason Christoff, who is a mind-control expert who speaks about the NWO and occult tactics. Coffee certainly is extremely ubiquitous, both in person and in media. Christoff alleges that Bill Gates (or his old man) actually bought Starbucks years ago because it is such a great tool for their ends. Most people believe Howard Schultz owns it, but who can ever say who really owns these places.
I wouldn't let the "fear porn" get to me. If you scrutinize anything close enough, you can find a reason not to do it or consume it. If you enjoy coffee and don't see any ill effects from it I wouldn't feel compelled to try and quit. I largely cut off coffee/caffeine a few years ago and don't feel much discernible difference (either better or worse).
Starbucks isn't coffee, they sell essentially coffee-flavored milkshakes given all the additives. Starbucks is pretty much why fat vegetarians are able to exist.
Christoff alleges that Bill Gates (or his old man) actually bought Starbucks years ago because it is such a great tool for their ends.
I actually remember a conspiracy theory from years ago, that I unfortunately have forgotten much of, but it basically argued against coffee by begging one question of 'why do you think there's a starbucks on every corner around the globe'.
While I could easily write that off as capitalistic growth, it does come across somewhat strange to me. Though I am more inclined to believe its what they add to coffee that is bad and will eventually create a medical patient.
I've heard the same from Jason Christoff, who is a mind-control expert who speaks about the NWO and occult tactics. Coffee certainly is extremely ubiquitous, both in person and in media. Christoff alleges that Bill Gates (or his old man) actually bought Starbucks years ago because it is such a great tool for their ends. Most people believe Howard Schultz owns it, but who can ever say who really owns these places.
I wouldn't let the "fear porn" get to me. If you scrutinize anything close enough, you can find a reason not to do it or consume it. If you enjoy coffee and don't see any ill effects from it I wouldn't feel compelled to try and quit. I largely cut off coffee/caffeine a few years ago and don't feel much discernible difference (either better or worse).
Starbucks isn't coffee, they sell essentially coffee-flavored milkshakes given all the additives. Starbucks is pretty much why fat vegetarians are able to exist.
I don't go anywhere near that trash garbage. It's just a bunch of sugar to cover uo the taste of nasty over roasted coffee beans.
"nasty over roasted coffee beans"
The reason I've only tried StarSucks coffee once (regular old coffee-flavored coffee), almost 20 years ago. One sip and I threw that pond swill out.
amazing how horrible starbux is
I actually remember a conspiracy theory from years ago, that I unfortunately have forgotten much of, but it basically argued against coffee by begging one question of 'why do you think there's a starbucks on every corner around the globe'.
While I could easily write that off as capitalistic growth, it does come across somewhat strange to me. Though I am more inclined to believe its what they add to coffee that is bad and will eventually create a medical patient.