You say there's no such thing then you apply a definition to it. What sense does that make? Look through your family tree and you'll find multiple "young women" having children with men over the age of 18. If you want to call your ancestors rapists be my guest.
.
"Child prostitution" -children can't consent.
They're rape victims, sexual assault victims, or survivors.
Consent wasn't implied and victim-hood wasn't denied. This is just an appeal to emotion.
.
Non-consensual sex is polite weasel wording for "rape"
How though? If I asked you to define rape and you said non-consensual sex, are you a weasel?
.
and rapist don't deserve your politeness
Were they being called Non-consensualists? Are you implying people that haven't been convicted of a crime be treated like trash? Because there have been a lot of false rape allegations from women that later regret their decision to have sex with someone and think they can revoke consent post facto.
.
FIGHT rape culture where this type of terminology is used to soften rape
We don't live in a rape culture. This isn't the middle east. Rape Culture is a 3rd wave feminist (marxist) talking point. It's very ambiguous and designed to dismantle our legal system. This is just emotion based nonsense.
But that’s by design, yaknow? They want to normalize Mike Obama’s dick we’ve all seen poking around in his dress, and to normalize Bill Clinton being on top of a 13 year old—like it’s perfectly acceptable. They know the public will hang them otherwise.
Taking the left’s terminology and reclaiming it can be powerful. We live in a culture where a bunch of rapists basically get worshipped, I’d be comfortable calling it a rape culture in this context
I see it that pointing out we live in a culture that worships real rapists to a bunch of third wave feminists crying about some fake rape culture bs, it could be a way to bang their two brain cells together and get a bit of a reaction
Is your answer we make it harder to give any rebuttal to the left’s ideas with stringent limitations on what we can say, while they censor us and they say whatever they want and they make whatever accusations they want? Is not using (or parodying) their terminology more important than criticizing their rapist leaders and their hypocrisy?
"Underage woman" there's no such thing.
An underage woman is a child.
You say there's no such thing then you apply a definition to it. What sense does that make? Look through your family tree and you'll find multiple "young women" having children with men over the age of 18. If you want to call your ancestors rapists be my guest.
.
"Child prostitution" -children can't consent.
They're rape victims, sexual assault victims, or survivors.
Consent wasn't implied and victim-hood wasn't denied. This is just an appeal to emotion.
.
Non-consensual sex is polite weasel wording for "rape"
How though? If I asked you to define rape and you said non-consensual sex, are you a weasel?
.
and rapist don't deserve your politeness
Were they being called Non-consensualists? Are you implying people that haven't been convicted of a crime be treated like trash? Because there have been a lot of false rape allegations from women that later regret their decision to have sex with someone and think they can revoke consent post facto.
.
FIGHT rape culture where this type of terminology is used to soften rape
We don't live in a rape culture. This isn't the middle east. Rape Culture is a 3rd wave feminist (marxist) talking point. It's very ambiguous and designed to dismantle our legal system. This is just emotion based nonsense.
Wait…hold on. The left can’t even define a woman.
🤣 True 🤣
But that’s by design, yaknow? They want to normalize Mike Obama’s dick we’ve all seen poking around in his dress, and to normalize Bill Clinton being on top of a 13 year old—like it’s perfectly acceptable. They know the public will hang them otherwise.
Taking the left’s terminology and reclaiming it can be powerful. We live in a culture where a bunch of rapists basically get worshipped, I’d be comfortable calling it a rape culture in this context
You're not "reclaiming" anything, it's a marxist invention and ambiguous by design.
I see it that pointing out we live in a culture that worships real rapists to a bunch of third wave feminists crying about some fake rape culture bs, it could be a way to bang their two brain cells together and get a bit of a reaction
"worships real rapists"
Define worshiping real rapists.
There's no such thing as a unicorn either.
But I can define it.
No, you can't define it because mythology already defined it.
Marxists mythology has already defined rape culture.
You can't search the term and get results that favor your definition.
Is your answer we make it harder to give any rebuttal to the left’s ideas with stringent limitations on what we can say, while they censor us and they say whatever they want and they make whatever accusations they want? Is not using (or parodying) their terminology more important than criticizing their rapist leaders and their hypocrisy?
If you want to hold them to their standards and mock them that's fine but there's no reason to redefine it as that could lend credence to their terms.