No, Rancourt and colleagues consistently both debunk the millions saved and estimate 17 million killed. Their 17 mill is a legit estimate based on analysis of countries in the Southern hemisphere. Of course there have been efforts to discredit their work, but not successfully IMO.
Errr, Josh Walkos just goes ad hominem and points out obvious conflicts of interest. Relevant but...
Much stronger are formal critiques and absurdities of the models that claim millions of lives saved, e.g. https://correlation-canada.org/nobel-vaccine-and-all-cause-mortality/ from Hickey and Rancourt--who are the ones who estimate 17 million killed.
This is one of the sharpest contradictions I've ever seen in scientific publications.
Wait, the same guys who claimed millions saved also are the ones claiming 17 million killed?
BTW, I have always felt that 17 million number was a troll to get people talking, but didnt realise it was the same folks.
I guess in the end we will see that depending on who pays them, they can give whatever result you need.
No, Rancourt and colleagues consistently both debunk the millions saved and estimate 17 million killed. Their 17 mill is a legit estimate based on analysis of countries in the Southern hemisphere. Of course there have been efforts to discredit their work, but not successfully IMO.
Okay thanks for this