The account that shared rhe vid and of a female Arizona research Dr (I don't recall if it was tenpenny or someone else) that said all MRNA based shots killed 100% of their rabbits the following cycle (ie the next round of the virus that was introduced).
IF there is any credibility to that research claim (IIRC about 10 before the Covid Shots were pushed), then we should have seen many more deaths the year following everyone being coerced to take the shots. Maybe the biotech was refined, maybe the shots were not stored cold enough & maybe there are many doctors who simply gave saline & didn't say any differently.
I just don't see a pathway for a sudden die off this year unless there is some other data that we haven't been offered yet.
Could it happen? Sure. Though I just don't see the mechanism to compel everyone who took the shot to suddenly start dying. Rather I figure that death rates will climb & it will never be blamed on the shots if things go as they historically did.
I remember Dr. Malone said mRNA is extremely expensive and unlikely to be in billions of shots. Also there was an article (don't know where to retrieve it) that said there was no biological material in thousands of vaccines tested. That means no RNA and no spike proteins, Just graphene oxides, heavy metals, etc.
That's right. It came down to logistics IIRC, there wasn't enough time to get these ready even if they had started working on it for. A year before COVID was announced. I need to look & see if the posts from guys who claimed to be logistics professionals posts are still around. It made sense when we thought about how many hours it would take to make these shots & then get them delivered properly.
If the pharma companies didn't have them ready, but the competitors would lie & get paid to sell saline, then they too needed to do it so they didn't miss out on government money. The idea was proposed that the boosters would contain more of the spike protien stuff because there was more time to get those produced. This was the theroy running around IIRC.
I believe rabbits versus human years are also a part of the equation. Just as in mice. Labs have specific timelines for this, monkeys also have a different years in time although much closer to humans.
The account that shared rhe vid and of a female Arizona research Dr (I don't recall if it was tenpenny or someone else) that said all MRNA based shots killed 100% of their rabbits the following cycle (ie the next round of the virus that was introduced).
IF there is any credibility to that research claim (IIRC about 10 before the Covid Shots were pushed), then we should have seen many more deaths the year following everyone being coerced to take the shots. Maybe the biotech was refined, maybe the shots were not stored cold enough & maybe there are many doctors who simply gave saline & didn't say any differently.
I just don't see a pathway for a sudden die off this year unless there is some other data that we haven't been offered yet.
Could it happen? Sure. Though I just don't see the mechanism to compel everyone who took the shot to suddenly start dying. Rather I figure that death rates will climb & it will never be blamed on the shots if things go as they historically did.
I remember Dr. Malone said mRNA is extremely expensive and unlikely to be in billions of shots. Also there was an article (don't know where to retrieve it) that said there was no biological material in thousands of vaccines tested. That means no RNA and no spike proteins, Just graphene oxides, heavy metals, etc.
That's right. It came down to logistics IIRC, there wasn't enough time to get these ready even if they had started working on it for. A year before COVID was announced. I need to look & see if the posts from guys who claimed to be logistics professionals posts are still around. It made sense when we thought about how many hours it would take to make these shots & then get them delivered properly.
If the pharma companies didn't have them ready, but the competitors would lie & get paid to sell saline, then they too needed to do it so they didn't miss out on government money. The idea was proposed that the boosters would contain more of the spike protien stuff because there was more time to get those produced. This was the theroy running around IIRC.
I think that is a very well articulated and concise response to the "die off" proponents.
I believe rabbits versus human years are also a part of the equation. Just as in mice. Labs have specific timelines for this, monkeys also have a different years in time although much closer to humans.
That is true, and I really don't have any recollection of how much time passed on rabbits if any at all was discussed.