I agree with you. Who knows who that guy is or was working for. He had been attending the those BLM protests that turned into riots. There is no such thing as a Q Shaman. He obviously gave himself the name.
In an event full of Feds, this guy walks in supposedly as a "Q Shaman", which feeds into the insane claims by the WEF that Q is a dangerous religion, has his own personal camera crew as seen by other angles of the event, proceeds to do a whole bunch of mainstream media interviews, avoids prosecution, and now gets pushed as some spiritual guru or guide.
The real question is, why aren't you questioning any of this?
Or does your Q research go as far as shilling for some random dude because he happens to wear a label.
Some assets put D next to their names, other assets R, and yet more assets put a Q next to their name.
Or are we all just forgetting about the embarrassing saga of that fed Austin Steinbart?
I provided you with far more info points than you did (which amounted to"REEE, LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!"), but I can see you're a man who runs on emotion, so I must depart.
No such thing as a Q Shaman.
There certainly are psyops with personal camera crews though.
Stop trying to lead people astray.
What do you mean by astray?
From your personal religious beliefs? Or from Q?
If it's the former that's just a reflection on how little faith in God you have when it comes to the process.
If it's the latter, it's not confusing anyone at this point to reference him by a well known label on a Q board.
I agree with you. Who knows who that guy is or was working for. He had been attending the those BLM protests that turned into riots. There is no such thing as a Q Shaman. He obviously gave himself the name.
lol that’s so idiotic, you must be another Fed who roams this board
Now try using your intelligence.
In an event full of Feds, this guy walks in supposedly as a "Q Shaman", which feeds into the insane claims by the WEF that Q is a dangerous religion, has his own personal camera crew as seen by other angles of the event, proceeds to do a whole bunch of mainstream media interviews, avoids prosecution, and now gets pushed as some spiritual guru or guide.
The real question is, why aren't you questioning any of this?
Or does your Q research go as far as shilling for some random dude because he happens to wear a label.
Some assets put D next to their names, other assets R, and yet more assets put a Q next to their name.
Or are we all just forgetting about the embarrassing saga of that fed Austin Steinbart?
Just do a little research, like on your own, you’ll answer your own questions
I provided you with far more info points than you did (which amounted to"REEE, LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!"), but I can see you're a man who runs on emotion, so I must depart.