Every time I hear another deep explanation of how gain of function research and bioengineering works and that "trust me guys, it's the researchers making deadly contagious particles"...
Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.
I am reminded of the cold hard facts. Masks not only don't work, they are responsible for a net negative effect. PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold. Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease- and that vaccines require a whole host of adjuvants in order to provoke any immune response. Death certificate coding was changed to make nearly every death potentially attributable to Covid. Since all symptoms were assigned to Covid, and things like heart conditions and pneumonia went untreated and people were sent to "quarantine" instead of getting properly evaluated. Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours. And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.
Any defense of the research community and the "novel virus" that does not address the abject institutional fraud and systematic murder and propaganda that was required to convince the public there was a deadly pandemic has zero merit.
If "the science" has any exceptions at all, it is not hard science. It is a flawed hypothesis, at best, that needs to be thrown out and reevaluated. Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.
The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.
Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.
Your second sentence is true, which should make you re-evaluate your first sentence.
PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold.
PCR actually CREATES a lot of DNA sequences. Creates things that were never in the original sample.
This is why cranking up the cycles is sure to eventually create enough small DNA fragments that a computer program will piece enough of them together to "match" something bad in the "Bad Stuff Database."
Fewer cycles means fewer fragments created, which means no "match" to the bad stuff.
This is how they manipulated "Covid cases."
Ramp up the PCR cycles and you will get more "matches" and therefore more "cases."
Roll out the vaxx, and then reduce the PCR cycles, and you will get fewer "matches" and therefore fewer "cases," thereby ... "proving" that the vaxx saved the world !!!
I am not a DeSantis fan, but he has done some good things. One thing he did in 2020 was require testing labs to disclose how many PCR cycles they used to arrive at their result.
And what do ya know? Immediately thereafter, "Covid cases" in Florida dropped a bunch. Wow. Shocking.
I don't know who gave him the idea to do that, but someone might have known something.
Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease
Even worse, no virus has ever been isolated. The word "isolated" is misused by the fraudsters by re-defining the term.
"Gay" used to mean happy, now it means faggot.
"Vaccine" used to mean injecting a "live virus" (no such thing, it turns out) to protect against future infection. Now, it means injecting something into someone to reduce symptoms ... or "cases."
"Isolate" used to mean (and really still does) to separate from all other things. But to virologists, it means mixing it with other things, using a bogus process, and claiming that the end result proves the virus is real. If they take a sample from one person, they call that isolation because it was from one person. This is really dumb, but that's what they do.
Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours.
Probably true. And almost everyone who "died of Covid" did so in a hospital. Nobody just dropped dead in a classroom or on a football field -- until the vaxx rollout.
And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.
Thus, helping to create more "cases."
Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.
True. But what passes for science today rarely ever uses the Scientific Method. Instead, they use "expert consensus" and "peer review" and "trust the science" and other such propaganda.
The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.
Regarding "viral" spread and contagious diseases...
I personally do not think that viruses are a culprit for illness. There is a lot more there, but this is a long comment- the research has been attempted for over a century since the "Spanish Flu", and people or animals do not get make one another sick with bodily fluids. In lab settings, adjuvants are required to make animals sick. Healthy animals cannot be made sick through proximity to unhealthy animals in lab settings. Many experiments also rely on extremely toxic "placebos" that cause allergic reactions in the subjects, and then the "test results" are compared to whatever difference occurs between the toxic placebo and the test.
Our bodies have various detox and healing responses with distinct symptoms and byproducts that are universal and can be tested. But it's a machine producing those byproducts, our very specialized cells are not "hijacked" and lose their essential functions in order to become "virus factories" and then return to their initial form and function suddenly when the "immune system wins". The whole setup is hogwash.
The simplest explanation is energy and electricity. We have energetic fields, and we know how they work in some very limited ways. If you're depressed, your dog knows to snuggle you. If your wife is seething mad about something, you can physically feel her anger and it generates anxiety in you until you deal with it. The female period sync has had a ton of investigation both ways and the general consensus is that it doesn't exist- but there is so much anecdotal evidence to this that I'm skeptical- but I don't use it as a hard piece of evidence. But we share energy, and that energy triggers an immune response- IF YOU NEED IT.
The best test case for this is Tuberculosis. TB is VERY CONTAGIOUS, but only in households where they cook or heat with fire indoors. The primary symptoms are that you cough until you're done- either by clearing out sufficient cumulative smoke inhalation or dying- and have general weakness/fever/chills. Westerners exposed to TB test positive for the rest of their lives (my Dad is one), but they do not get sick- not because they do not "contract" the illness, but rather because they do not generate one. TB has been eradicated from the First World without vaccines, but it is still deadly throughout the Third World.
Another is Hepatitis. You can get hepatitis from things like drug abuse, from drinking too much, from taking too much Tylenol. And the probability that someone tests positive after a Hepatitis needlestick is around 0.5%. The probability that a random person tests positive for Hepatitis is around 0.5%. If you are exposed to Hepatitis- of any form- and you do not have the precondition necessary to generate an immune response- which is simply Hepa (liver) and -titis (swelling/inflammation)- which is your body sending extra resources to your liver in order to process toxins more rapidly because of long-term cumulative toxic exposure, you are no more likely to get sick after a needlestick as you were before the needlestick. My Dad had an accidental needlestick from an unruly Hepatitis patient in the clinic like 15 years ago and had no issues at all.
When you get an AIDS test, you are asked lifestyle questions. Why?
The biggest indicator that disease is generated internally is that nearly every single blood test for illness is a population count, and not a test for the absolute presence of the contagion. You have e.coli, the problem is if you have too much.
You have pneumococcal antibodies, the problem is if you have too many too recently. You have HPV, and a host of all manner of viruses and bacteria. If you look hard enough (or crank the cycles up enough times in Covid's case- and PCR can be magnified far more than 45 cycles), you can find anything in anyone.
"PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody... There's very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of in your body".
-Kary Mullis
By the way, the mechanism of death for Remdesivir is pretty straightforward.
It was a failed Ebola drug, and crazy toxic, killing around 50% people in the trial compared to the baseline 35%.
"Overall, about 50% of people who received either Zmapp or remdesivir died during the trial. In contrast, only about 35% of people who received either Mab114 or REGN-EB3 died. Three participants died of side effects thought to be related to treatment—two in the ZMapp group and one in the remdesivir group."
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/two-drugs-reduce-risk-death-ebola
When your kidneys are overloaded with something extremely toxic, they dump fluid into your lungs as an escape valve, kind of like how your gallbladder dumps bile into your liver to induce vomiting with food poisoning and to help break down excess toxins.
Remdesivir is wildly toxic and induces an extreme kidney response, often accompanied with kidney failure, and since "Covid" was classified a respiratory disease, worsening symptoms were treated with ventilation.
The problem with ventilation, aside from the extreme invasiveness (the general principle is to NEVER ventilate someone without an obstructed airway as it is so dangerous), is that it is so painful and uncomfortable that people have to be sedated with morphine or midazolam for it to work. And sedation prevents you from coughing out the crap that is filling your lungs because your kidneys are boxed. Additionally, with the "quarantine" measures, people were not being appropriately monitored and fluid was not being suctioned from their lungs because a "known" symptom was precipitously low O2 SATs. So their lungs fill up with fluid without any exit point, their blood oxygen dropped to nothing, and they drowned in their own fluids alone in a hospital room with nobody watching them and no family members in the room to raise the alarm.
But we share energy, and that energy triggers an immune response- IF YOU NEED IT.
That is a plausible theory.
The main problem we have today is: So many people have been indoctrinated into the false Germ Theory, that nobody is really testing other ideas to find out the root cause of illness(es).
If we had as much resources into other ideas as "germs," we would find some answers.
TB is VERY CONTAGIOUS, but only in households where they cook or heat with fire indoors.
That indicates to me that it is the indoor fire that causes the problem, and not some communicable disease.
If I do indoor fires, and my whole family gets sick, and then my kids play outdoors with your kids or even in your house, but your kids don't get sick, then it probably means something is going on inside my house that causes the sickness.
TB has been eradicated from the First World without vaccines, but it is still deadly throughout the Third World.
Probably because we don't DO what they do.
You can get hepatitis from things like drug abuse, from drinking too much, from taking too much Tylenol.
... which is simply Hepa (liver) and -titis (swelling/inflammation)- which is your body sending extra resources to your liver in order to process toxins more rapidly ...
Again, seems like an external toxic/poison that is causing it, and not a "virus."
I have read that Hep C is ususually something that happens to people with a lot of tattoos. The ink going into your bloodstream (or maybe just certain inks) cannot be healthy.
When you get an AIDS test, you are asked lifestyle questions. Why?
AIDS is not an illness. There is nothing specific about it. It is just a defninition.
The CDC has a list of 30+ illnesses (maybe more now, since I have not checked in years) that, if (a) you have one of them AND (b) you test positive for HIV, then you are diagnosed with AIDS.
If you have the illness but are HIV- (such as TB, which is on the list), then you "just" have TB. But if you have the illness and are HIV+, then the diagnosis is AIDS.
HIV is a retrovirus, and like ALL viruses has NEVER been isolated and purified, and there is no REAL evidence that it exists at all.
The "10-Year Study" was a study over 10 years of married couples, where one was HIV+ and the other was HIV-. During those 10 years, they had thousands of sexual acts with HIV+/HIV- and in 10 years, ZERO people who were HIV- because HIV+.
The test for HIV was the PCR test, which is NOT a real diagnostic tool. Since then, they have used Western Blot and other tests, all of which are fradulent as diagnostic tools.
Both HIV and AIDS are a scam for money. Neither exists. If you get a sickness that is listed on the CDC AIDS list, then yes, you are sick with that illness. But not AIDS.
The early AIDS patients in the 1980's were given AZT, an extremely toxic cancer drug that WILL kill you if you take it forever -- which is exactly what they were told to do.
Faggots in the West got weird sickness because they used nitrate poppers for loosening the anal muscles. They mixed these very toxic drugs with cocaine and other drugs to party all night, and they got sick from the drugs (not AIDS).
Africans, both male and female, got sick due to diseases of poverty and poor sanitation/hygene, and they got sick with different illnesses, but it became a gravy train for African countries to claim AIDS cases.
$$$$$
The biggest indicator that disease is generated internally is that nearly every single blood test for illness is a population count, and not a test for the absolute presence of the contagion
Right. They ALWAYS use some sort of surrogate method rather than simply finding that actual culprit.
I think illness is created by toxins and poisons, primarily the food/drink we consume, but also these other external influences, some of which are likely EMF's, radiation, etc.
"PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody... There's very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of in your body". -Kary Mullis
Even Mullis himself might not have fully realized -- but it has been shown since -- that PCR itself CREATES additional DNA fragments, which when aligned with primers and then compared with an ever-growing database of so-called harmful pathogens, can be found to be a "match" for something bad in that database.
This is why they want the MRNA method of creating "vaccines." It is so they can claim that anyone has anything, and it can be treated with a custom MRNA injection.
Every time I hear another deep explanation of how gain of function research and bioengineering works and that "trust me guys, it's the researchers making deadly contagious particles"...
Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.
I am reminded of the cold hard facts. Masks not only don't work, they are responsible for a net negative effect. PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold. Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease- and that vaccines require a whole host of adjuvants in order to provoke any immune response. Death certificate coding was changed to make nearly every death potentially attributable to Covid. Since all symptoms were assigned to Covid, and things like heart conditions and pneumonia went untreated and people were sent to "quarantine" instead of getting properly evaluated. Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours. And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.
Any defense of the research community and the "novel virus" that does not address the abject institutional fraud and systematic murder and propaganda that was required to convince the public there was a deadly pandemic has zero merit.
If "the science" has any exceptions at all, it is not hard science. It is a flawed hypothesis, at best, that needs to be thrown out and reevaluated. Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.
The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.
Your second sentence is true, which should make you re-evaluate your first sentence.
PCR actually CREATES a lot of DNA sequences. Creates things that were never in the original sample.
This is why cranking up the cycles is sure to eventually create enough small DNA fragments that a computer program will piece enough of them together to "match" something bad in the "Bad Stuff Database."
Fewer cycles means fewer fragments created, which means no "match" to the bad stuff.
This is how they manipulated "Covid cases."
Ramp up the PCR cycles and you will get more "matches" and therefore more "cases."
Roll out the vaxx, and then reduce the PCR cycles, and you will get fewer "matches" and therefore fewer "cases," thereby ... "proving" that the vaxx saved the world !!!
I am not a DeSantis fan, but he has done some good things. One thing he did in 2020 was require testing labs to disclose how many PCR cycles they used to arrive at their result.
And what do ya know? Immediately thereafter, "Covid cases" in Florida dropped a bunch. Wow. Shocking.
I don't know who gave him the idea to do that, but someone might have known something.
Even worse, no virus has ever been isolated. The word "isolated" is misused by the fraudsters by re-defining the term.
"Gay" used to mean happy, now it means faggot.
"Vaccine" used to mean injecting a "live virus" (no such thing, it turns out) to protect against future infection. Now, it means injecting something into someone to reduce symptoms ... or "cases."
"Isolate" used to mean (and really still does) to separate from all other things. But to virologists, it means mixing it with other things, using a bogus process, and claiming that the end result proves the virus is real. If they take a sample from one person, they call that isolation because it was from one person. This is really dumb, but that's what they do.
Probably true. And almost everyone who "died of Covid" did so in a hospital. Nobody just dropped dead in a classroom or on a football field -- until the vaxx rollout.
Thus, helping to create more "cases."
True. But what passes for science today rarely ever uses the Scientific Method. Instead, they use "expert consensus" and "peer review" and "trust the science" and other such propaganda.
BINGO.
Regarding "viral" spread and contagious diseases...
I personally do not think that viruses are a culprit for illness. There is a lot more there, but this is a long comment- the research has been attempted for over a century since the "Spanish Flu", and people or animals do not get make one another sick with bodily fluids. In lab settings, adjuvants are required to make animals sick. Healthy animals cannot be made sick through proximity to unhealthy animals in lab settings. Many experiments also rely on extremely toxic "placebos" that cause allergic reactions in the subjects, and then the "test results" are compared to whatever difference occurs between the toxic placebo and the test.
Our bodies have various detox and healing responses with distinct symptoms and byproducts that are universal and can be tested. But it's a machine producing those byproducts, our very specialized cells are not "hijacked" and lose their essential functions in order to become "virus factories" and then return to their initial form and function suddenly when the "immune system wins". The whole setup is hogwash.
The simplest explanation is energy and electricity. We have energetic fields, and we know how they work in some very limited ways. If you're depressed, your dog knows to snuggle you. If your wife is seething mad about something, you can physically feel her anger and it generates anxiety in you until you deal with it. The female period sync has had a ton of investigation both ways and the general consensus is that it doesn't exist- but there is so much anecdotal evidence to this that I'm skeptical- but I don't use it as a hard piece of evidence. But we share energy, and that energy triggers an immune response- IF YOU NEED IT.
The best test case for this is Tuberculosis. TB is VERY CONTAGIOUS, but only in households where they cook or heat with fire indoors. The primary symptoms are that you cough until you're done- either by clearing out sufficient cumulative smoke inhalation or dying- and have general weakness/fever/chills. Westerners exposed to TB test positive for the rest of their lives (my Dad is one), but they do not get sick- not because they do not "contract" the illness, but rather because they do not generate one. TB has been eradicated from the First World without vaccines, but it is still deadly throughout the Third World.
Another is Hepatitis. You can get hepatitis from things like drug abuse, from drinking too much, from taking too much Tylenol. And the probability that someone tests positive after a Hepatitis needlestick is around 0.5%. The probability that a random person tests positive for Hepatitis is around 0.5%. If you are exposed to Hepatitis- of any form- and you do not have the precondition necessary to generate an immune response- which is simply Hepa (liver) and -titis (swelling/inflammation)- which is your body sending extra resources to your liver in order to process toxins more rapidly because of long-term cumulative toxic exposure, you are no more likely to get sick after a needlestick as you were before the needlestick. My Dad had an accidental needlestick from an unruly Hepatitis patient in the clinic like 15 years ago and had no issues at all.
When you get an AIDS test, you are asked lifestyle questions. Why?
The biggest indicator that disease is generated internally is that nearly every single blood test for illness is a population count, and not a test for the absolute presence of the contagion. You have e.coli, the problem is if you have too much. You have pneumococcal antibodies, the problem is if you have too many too recently. You have HPV, and a host of all manner of viruses and bacteria. If you look hard enough (or crank the cycles up enough times in Covid's case- and PCR can be magnified far more than 45 cycles), you can find anything in anyone.
"PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody... There's very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of in your body". -Kary Mullis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmZft4fXhQQ&ab_channel=EduardoCorrochio
By the way, the mechanism of death for Remdesivir is pretty straightforward.
It was a failed Ebola drug, and crazy toxic, killing around 50% people in the trial compared to the baseline 35%.
"Overall, about 50% of people who received either Zmapp or remdesivir died during the trial. In contrast, only about 35% of people who received either Mab114 or REGN-EB3 died. Three participants died of side effects thought to be related to treatment—two in the ZMapp group and one in the remdesivir group." https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/two-drugs-reduce-risk-death-ebola
When your kidneys are overloaded with something extremely toxic, they dump fluid into your lungs as an escape valve, kind of like how your gallbladder dumps bile into your liver to induce vomiting with food poisoning and to help break down excess toxins.
Remdesivir is wildly toxic and induces an extreme kidney response, often accompanied with kidney failure, and since "Covid" was classified a respiratory disease, worsening symptoms were treated with ventilation.
The problem with ventilation, aside from the extreme invasiveness (the general principle is to NEVER ventilate someone without an obstructed airway as it is so dangerous), is that it is so painful and uncomfortable that people have to be sedated with morphine or midazolam for it to work. And sedation prevents you from coughing out the crap that is filling your lungs because your kidneys are boxed. Additionally, with the "quarantine" measures, people were not being appropriately monitored and fluid was not being suctioned from their lungs because a "known" symptom was precipitously low O2 SATs. So their lungs fill up with fluid without any exit point, their blood oxygen dropped to nothing, and they drowned in their own fluids alone in a hospital room with nobody watching them and no family members in the room to raise the alarm.
Agreed.
And Fauci and CDC people should all be tried for manslaughter.
In case you are still reading this thread ...
That is a plausible theory.
The main problem we have today is: So many people have been indoctrinated into the false Germ Theory, that nobody is really testing other ideas to find out the root cause of illness(es).
If we had as much resources into other ideas as "germs," we would find some answers.
That indicates to me that it is the indoor fire that causes the problem, and not some communicable disease.
If I do indoor fires, and my whole family gets sick, and then my kids play outdoors with your kids or even in your house, but your kids don't get sick, then it probably means something is going on inside my house that causes the sickness.
Probably because we don't DO what they do.
Again, seems like an external toxic/poison that is causing it, and not a "virus."
I have read that Hep C is ususually something that happens to people with a lot of tattoos. The ink going into your bloodstream (or maybe just certain inks) cannot be healthy.
AIDS is not an illness. There is nothing specific about it. It is just a defninition.
The CDC has a list of 30+ illnesses (maybe more now, since I have not checked in years) that, if (a) you have one of them AND (b) you test positive for HIV, then you are diagnosed with AIDS.
If you have the illness but are HIV- (such as TB, which is on the list), then you "just" have TB. But if you have the illness and are HIV+, then the diagnosis is AIDS.
HIV is a retrovirus, and like ALL viruses has NEVER been isolated and purified, and there is no REAL evidence that it exists at all.
The "10-Year Study" was a study over 10 years of married couples, where one was HIV+ and the other was HIV-. During those 10 years, they had thousands of sexual acts with HIV+/HIV- and in 10 years, ZERO people who were HIV- because HIV+.
The test for HIV was the PCR test, which is NOT a real diagnostic tool. Since then, they have used Western Blot and other tests, all of which are fradulent as diagnostic tools.
Both HIV and AIDS are a scam for money. Neither exists. If you get a sickness that is listed on the CDC AIDS list, then yes, you are sick with that illness. But not AIDS.
The early AIDS patients in the 1980's were given AZT, an extremely toxic cancer drug that WILL kill you if you take it forever -- which is exactly what they were told to do.
Faggots in the West got weird sickness because they used nitrate poppers for loosening the anal muscles. They mixed these very toxic drugs with cocaine and other drugs to party all night, and they got sick from the drugs (not AIDS).
Africans, both male and female, got sick due to diseases of poverty and poor sanitation/hygene, and they got sick with different illnesses, but it became a gravy train for African countries to claim AIDS cases.
$$$$$
Right. They ALWAYS use some sort of surrogate method rather than simply finding that actual culprit.
I think illness is created by toxins and poisons, primarily the food/drink we consume, but also these other external influences, some of which are likely EMF's, radiation, etc.
Even Mullis himself might not have fully realized -- but it has been shown since -- that PCR itself CREATES additional DNA fragments, which when aligned with primers and then compared with an ever-growing database of so-called harmful pathogens, can be found to be a "match" for something bad in that database.
This is why they want the MRNA method of creating "vaccines." It is so they can claim that anyone has anything, and it can be treated with a custom MRNA injection.
Big money and big control.
What makes you think that?