Its being set up like trump needs it to happen but i think im expecting it to go the other way. 90-100m people are going to vote for trump right so our voice will be heard. Dont we need the supreme court to rule against immunity? Then what happens to trump besides our voice nullifying all these sham trials? Is he found not guilty on everything regardless? Thats how i see it going anyway
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
They might rule against immunity, but make an exception as a "grandfather clause," to exclude past presidents from the new ruling. If a president had immunity at the time of an alleged crime, then their immunity would stand, but the new ruling would apply to future presidents.
I am not suggesting that is what the SCOTUS would, or should do, only suggesting that I think that could be an option.