For those that were following politics 20 years ago: If the crazy negative bias in the media (news, late night shows, Hollywood, etc) against Trump is a 97 out of 100... then what number would you give the treatment George W Bush received at the time?
I remember a lot of George W Bush jokes and hatred during the early part of this century, but I literally did not follow politics AT ALL until the day after the 2016 election when I started to look into it. ONE of the things that I found strange right off the bat was the over the top, nonsensical and hysterical hatred for our new president. It made me intuit, even before Q or anything else, that something weird was going on. But, some argue that Bush was treated the same way by the media (the legal system is another story). For those that paid attention, how different is this?
Dole exemplified the adage, "All that evil needs to triumph, is for good men to do nothing." It would be like voting for an armchair. I can't remember if I even voted in that election.
So your voting decision is based on how entertaining the candidate is/was?
You can ask that question of someone else and get an answer. No candidate was "entertaining." Dole was going to be a do-nothing, just like an armchair. To borrow a phrase used often around here, "expand your mind."
I am not the fuckwit who votes for the most entertaining candidate, that's you.
That's absurd. I guess you can't tell the difference between someone who is effective and someone who is ineffective. Plus, I never vote for Democrats and never have. So much for your accurate view of the world. Or do you have a secret admiration for Bob Dole? Let us know. Explain it if you can.