I think you're being a bit unfair to him. He has some bad positions, no doubt, but if you actually listen to him he clearly values the rights in the Constitution. Prior to June 26, 2008 the Supreme Court had not declared the Second Amendment an individual right. And that informs his positions, he says he doesn't not support gun control because it doesn't work and because of the Supreme Court's ruling about the 2nd Amendment being an individual right. The Bill of Rights is the same reason he believes vaccination shouldn't be forced.
He had to rely on a Supreme Court ruling that should never have been needed. Cmon man, if he believe the constitution he would have already claimed that as a core value. The s.c. affirmed the people reserve that right to themselves they didnt establish it. And if they hadn't affirmed it it still would have been true. It's a thinly veiled flip flop that he should not be given credit for.
I think you're being a bit unfair to him. He has some bad positions, no doubt, but if you actually listen to him he clearly values the rights in the Constitution. Prior to June 26, 2008 the Supreme Court had not declared the Second Amendment an individual right. And that informs his positions, he says he doesn't not support gun control because it doesn't work and because of the Supreme Court's ruling about the 2nd Amendment being an individual right. The Bill of Rights is the same reason he believes vaccination shouldn't be forced.
IF he Ever supported gun control, he is either a moron or a communist. NO ONE is that stupid.
There is one other choice you are missing. He believes in group-think and was afraid to go against his own party. Also known by the name "no balls".
He can still be a moron or a communist with choice 3 though.
Right. The establishment/communists/liberal is Weak and gutless=stupid. Either way he has No place in MAGA.
He had to rely on a Supreme Court ruling that should never have been needed. Cmon man, if he believe the constitution he would have already claimed that as a core value. The s.c. affirmed the people reserve that right to themselves they didnt establish it. And if they hadn't affirmed it it still would have been true. It's a thinly veiled flip flop that he should not be given credit for.