Been thinking about this long and hard the last few days. We assume that this phrase from Q means that Israel will be cleaned and the DS will be destroyed there just like we are doing around the world. But I do not think it means that anymore. I believe that it is referring to what the DS will use Israel for. At this point, one of the last actions they can take to keep Trump out of the white house, is to declare war. I think near the end of August we will actually see DEMs and RINOs try to call for war to back up Israel. I think the phrase actually means "They will use Israel as a LAST resort to stop Trump" I honestly do not think we will have a 2024 Election and this COULD be one of the reasons. Edit: I would like to add that not every one one of Q's posts need to be taken literally. Remember that misinformation is a MUST. If we could figure it out so easily, then THEY could figure it out easily. Just as i think we will never see the "My fellow Americans" post. It is a distraction
I do not think "saving Israel for last" means what we think it does
FIFTH GEN WARFARE
Under the Obama plan, the entire ME was to be destabilized either thru radical Shia factions or the Muslim Brotherhood which are primarily Sunni. The MB is heavily imbedded within the US government or leverages influence through numerous NGOs. Iran has its own influencers within the government to lobby behind the scenes. China is also there through United Front little pink efforts. Obama is a communist and is a Muslim sympathizer. Communists often align with radical Islam - it serves their purposes. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Iran is just another chess piece on the board but it has aspirations of being a major player. Obama's, and now Biden's, ME policy has been a disaster and events taking place there currently are a result. The DS has been quietly financially supporting the efforts behind the scenes as you state. A nuclear armed Iran acts as a counterbalance so nobody will be able to threaten this chess piece. NK is the same.
There are a lot of moving pieces to this picture and many players - both in front and operating behind the scenes all jockeying for position. Who really funds Iran? Yes, there is US DS involvement, but are there others? Who stands to lose if a proposed economic corridor is established from India to the EU by way of SA and Israel? China and Russia are sputtering while West Pacific nations are on the rise. India especially has potential if they can solve their infrastructure issues. Who loses? China, Russia, and Iran are looking at their own economic corridor. China is investing in a couple of proposed corridors through Belt and Road. A corridor established by more Western leaning nations threatens this plan. This is why the Abraham Accord had to be blown up - but is it? Remember, what is said publicly may not necessarily be the truth of what is really occuring behind the scenes. China's current economic position could bring all these plans to an end and without China, Russia can't stand alone. Why did Iran stir up the pot now? Iran saw the prospect of being sidelined instead of being a major player. The problem with creating loose cannons is they don't always go off on cue when being activated.
The bottom line is always power and money. Follow the money and you will usually get your answers.
I just don't understand how, to my knowledge, it has never been brought up by the talking heads. You would think one of them would have said, "And Iran has enough petroleum to meet their energy needs for hundreds of years, so why were they allowed to develop a nuclear energy program?"
A nuclear armed nation is one that can't be trifled with. It gives the ruling entities of the country a certain amount of security to protect their regime from being toppled - not only from the outside, but also from within. Outside forces are not likely to invade and also less likely to meddle internally by stirring up factions within the country - which Iran has many. Other nations will think twice about destabilizing a nuclear armed nation and run the risk of even more radical entities taking control of nukes.
The DS ME policy has been to place Iran in a position to make them a linchpin to keep other ME players under control - primarily Israel and SA and to a lesser degree Egypt and Turkey. Remember, globalists want control. They don't want competition or nations making economic or other agreements on their own going off script. Look at what happened to Libya. Qaddafi was building up his country and looking to create an African currency. The bankers could not have that so they took him out and destroyed the country. It serves the globalist agenda to have a nuclear armed Iran. They care nothing about the country or its people. The talking heads just simply say what they are paid to say. They don't get paid to think.
I just can't believe that it is NEVER mentioned by ANY of the talking heads! It's like they have all been warned (threatened), so they all stay clear. Maybe I should get on the phone with one of them when they are live and ask them why THEY have never brought that point up. :) (I would need to disguise the reason for the call though)
Good idea. Like I said however, they are talking heads, not thinking heads. The questions are no doubt above their pay grade.