-
CONCLUSION: No Manipulation Detected.
-
NOTE: This doesn't mean it wasn't manipulated. It means at least with this software is was not detected.
-
I've downloaded the audio from https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/preview/mol/2024/01/23/4186753578982030593/636x382_MP4_4186753578982030593.mp4
EDIT: it appears the video link no longer works. Another link would have to be used for those that would like to test.
- I am using an audio authenticator forensics software from: https://github.com/Gabriel-Desharnais/audio-forensic-authentication
- This software does tampering detection: Digital audio tampering detection can be used to verify the authenticity of digital audio.
- I then ran this though the software and it did not detect anything noticeably altered.
I was thinking that may be what took her so long to release the recording. Some states have laws that say as long as one of the parties knows they were being recorded, it's OK.
Edit: After I posted this, I saw ProudOfAmerica's comment on Arizona being a one-party consent state.