Is there No proof of U. S. citizenship for Nikki Haley?
Nikki Haley (Nimarata Nikki Haley (née Randhawa)) was born Jan. 20, 1972 Her father became a naturalized citizen on Oct. 18, 1977—five years after Nikki was born.
Therefore, Nikki’s father Ajit Singh Randhawa was NOT a natural born U.S. Citizen. He was born in Amritsar, Punjab, India. Nikki is not eligible to hold the office of vice president or president. 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 According to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution, a person must be a natural-born citizen of the United States to be eligible for the presidency. The exact definition of a "natural-born citizen" has been a topic of debate, but it generally means that the person must be a citizen at birth, rather than having become a citizen later in life.
So, if my parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of my birth, I would not be considered a natural-born citizen, and therefore would not be eligible to run for president.
And yet, she is running! It seems like this is an issue that is never addressed. She cannot be entering into a presidential election as a candidate, as it is constitutionally prohibitive.
However, can she run? Can she declare to be a candidate? And when she is busy in a private political party primary, who are violating the constitution, and perhaps even their oath?
Turning it back to New Hampshire: how many people voted for her who took an oath to the constitution, or owe allegiance to the United States, or are under the jurisdiction thereof?
It seems to me, quite a number of people have perjured themselves .... to say the least, or committed an act of war against the United States by giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States.
Because, the constitution creates the US. Not the other way around. Hence, violate the constitution and it violates the US. ...