Well said. This was a trivial SC ruling... the 5th Circuit case is still ongoing. Meanwhile, Texas gets to have all kinds of fun flipping off the feds, and lots of other states get to join in as well.
The Chevron Deference case is huge. It would destroy the alphabet agencies ability to spew out all of those B.S. rules and regulations.
The two cases before the justices Wednesday, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, ask them to overturn the 1984 decision that established Chevron deference, leading to agency readings of statutes frequently prevailing in court. In both cases, small fishing companies brought lawsuits against the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to challenge a rule requiring them to shell out up to $700 a day to pay the salaries of federally-mandated on-board observers, which lower courts upheld on the basis of Chevron.
Well said. This was a trivial SC ruling... the 5th Circuit case is still ongoing. Meanwhile, Texas gets to have all kinds of fun flipping off the feds, and lots of other states get to join in as well.
The Chevron Deference case is huge. It would destroy the alphabet agencies ability to spew out all of those B.S. rules and regulations.