were you ever in the military? there is a specific meaning to "lawful orders". the governor of texas could hypothetically give unlawful orders, which his troops would be duty-bound to not follow. the brigs are full of people with incorrect theories as to what constitutes a lawful order
Who determines if it unlawful or not? Theoretically scotus does, but they have a habit of running counter to the constitution, which renders any such rulings moot. Per the Constitution.
well i know but i'm just saying. you have to depend on the conscience of the indiviidual in that case. and if border patrol was full of guys who care about what'a constitutional, they would have refused orders to cut the wire themselves. no need to call out the national guard and then have them refuse
were you ever in the military? there is a specific meaning to "lawful orders". the governor of texas could hypothetically give unlawful orders, which his troops would be duty-bound to not follow. the brigs are full of people with incorrect theories as to what constitutes a lawful order
Who determines if it unlawful or not? Theoretically scotus does, but they have a habit of running counter to the constitution, which renders any such rulings moot. Per the Constitution.
well i know but i'm just saying. you have to depend on the conscience of the indiviidual in that case. and if border patrol was full of guys who care about what'a constitutional, they would have refused orders to cut the wire themselves. no need to call out the national guard and then have them refuse