FBI charged with Jan. 6 ‘cover-up’ in Ashli Babbitt shooting case
(www.washingtonexaminer.com)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
In its new FOIA suit, Judicial Watch said that not only has the FBI refused its two demands for files but that the law enforcement agency has also stiff-armed the Justice Department office that advocates FOIA compliance, the Office of Information Policy.
In its four-page filing, the attorney for Aaron Babbitt and Judicial Watch said, “the FBI has failed to produce the requested records or demonstrate that the requested records are lawfully exempt from production; or notify plaintiffs of the scope of any responsive records they intend to produce or withhold and the reasons for any withholdings.”
Fitton said, “Ashli Babbit was the only homicide victim on Jan. 6, yet the FBI has been illicitly hiding its files on Ashli Babbitt from her family for a year. Why the cover-up?”
HOW DARE THEY! — BREAKING: FEDS ARREST PHILIP ANDERSON
Philip Anderson Was Nearly Killed on Jan. 6 by Police Violence – Passed Out Next to J6 Victim Rosanne Boyland Who Was Killed That Day - by Jim Hoft - Aug. 30, 2023
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/how-dare-they-breaking-feds-arrest-philip-anderson/
This photo shows Philip Anderson nearly unconscious being dragged away by Trump supporters after being crushed under a pile on Jan. 6. Roseanne Boyland was next to him when she died. Philip told The Gateway Pundit how he was holding Rosanne’s hand when she died.
Photo: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/philip-anderson-2.jpg
Question: Why do these organizations withhold information and get charged? Why wouldn't they just delete the information? Are there more severe consequences for deleting the info?
Those are questions we need answers to.
But but.. She aint fuckin real.
Good news is the questions are not going away.
cover up the cover up :)
The FBI hasn't been charged with anything in regards to Babbitt. Judicial watch filed a FOIA suit against them. Being charged with something and having a suit filed against you are two completely separate things.
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/bringingcharge/
I don't know if the author of that article doesn't know the difference between the two or if they're deliberately doing it to sway public opinion. Either way, it's extremely unprofessional.
This goes back several decades ago. LE investigates the alleged crime. Charges depend on how many element you can prove at trial. Depending on how many elements you can prove will decide what charge you can bring on the suspect. LE goes before a magistrate to swear out a WFA. If there is enough to statisfy the magistrate a WFA will be issued.
The arrest is made and sent to the DA, sometimes you are subpoenaed to testify before a Grand Jury. Many times you reveive notice from the clek of courts it is going to trial or a plea bargain was reached by the DA's office. There are times the DA or ADA may join in a investigation.
What does? How the court system works? It goes back much further than that.
I'll be honest, I have no idea what your point is here and I'm wondering if you understood the point of mine.