I'm 100% in on Flynn. For a wide number of reasons.
It's hard to build discernment. So i can understand vacillating.
One thing that helps is applying discernment to those who are raising the Anti-Flynn narratives. Their behavior.
just like one of the tells about [man-made climate change/covid/vaccines/etc] is the way that proponents behave. Alinsky-type methods, etc.
How the proponants behave is an important aspect of the data point evaluation, because part of discerning truth is to gain a sense of where the information [assertions/narratives] are coming from.
I'm 100% in on Flynn. For a wide number of reasons.
It's hard to build discernment. So i can understand vacillating.
One thing that helps is applying discernment to those who are raising the Anti-Flynn narratives. Their behavior.
just like one of the tells about [man-made climate change/covid/vaccines/etc] is the way that proponents behave. Alinsky-type methods, etc.
How the proponants behave is an important aspect of the data point evaluation, because part of discerning truth is to gain a sense of where the information [assertions/narratives] are coming from.