I have found Cates and his speculation to be mostly accurate over time. I do not understand the anti-Cates slant on this site, unless it is by shills. I have noticed someone will post a reasonable take by Cates and all these accounts come out of nowhere shouting the man down.
There are 2 things. One, which has gotten slightly better is his tone in talking down to his audience in a very high-horse fashion when, in fact, much of his audience is - at least - as smart, knowledgeable, and aware as he is. Two, with said tone he was very anti-Q for some time, then - for whatever reason - came around and jumped on the bandwagon - rather insufferably telling us what Q told us etc.
Cates is certainly onto absolutely nothing.
Aside of profiting from maybes and innuendo that may or may not have a semblance of validity when all is said and done, it's all guesswork
Another long-term account exposing themself as a "deep shill"
Because I disagree about Cates?
I've been consistent on that point since I wasn't a "shill"
I have found Cates and his speculation to be mostly accurate over time. I do not understand the anti-Cates slant on this site, unless it is by shills. I have noticed someone will post a reasonable take by Cates and all these accounts come out of nowhere shouting the man down.
There are 2 things. One, which has gotten slightly better is his tone in talking down to his audience in a very high-horse fashion when, in fact, much of his audience is - at least - as smart, knowledgeable, and aware as he is. Two, with said tone he was very anti-Q for some time, then - for whatever reason - came around and jumped on the bandwagon - rather insufferably telling us what Q told us etc.
He’s an idiot. Muh deaf cia plant. Wrong with hopium huge every time.