I have been listening to the proceedings and it is fascinating. So far, I think the liberal argument is falling apart. Essentially the argument that the States have the legal authority for taking that State's candidates off the ballot for State elected offices (based on exclusion clause) and that right can be extended to candidates for National offices. So far, the Judges are challenging this right to extend it to National offices. Equally important, it could easily lead to a chaotic quagmire of a plethora of States countering by removing opposing candidates and resulting in having only a few States then elected the officer (the Presidency in this case).
In layman's term, the argument is invalid and they and full of shit. Everyone should listen to the entire session to understand the U.S. Constitution.
...as I said, fascinating but also very educational.
This was a great listen and very satisfying to hear even the radical left wing of the court express their doubts as to the validity of the arguments. That is to say, the pouty tantrum being thrown by the insolent "leadership" of my once-great state. I'm kind of bummed I have to wait a week before I troll Fishface Griswold, but delayed gratification is very gratifying.
I have been listening to the proceedings and it is fascinating. So far, I think the liberal argument is falling apart. Essentially the argument that the States have the legal authority for taking that State's candidates off the ballot for State elected offices (based on exclusion clause) and that right can be extended to candidates for National offices. So far, the Judges are challenging this right to extend it to National offices. Equally important, it could easily lead to a chaotic quagmire of a plethora of States countering by removing opposing candidates and resulting in having only a few States then elected the officer (the Presidency in this case).
In layman's term, the argument is invalid and they and full of shit. Everyone should listen to the entire session to understand the U.S. Constitution.
...as I said, fascinating but also very educational.
This was a great listen and very satisfying to hear even the radical left wing of the court express their doubts as to the validity of the arguments. That is to say, the pouty tantrum being thrown by the insolent "leadership" of my once-great state. I'm kind of bummed I have to wait a week before I troll Fishface Griswold, but delayed gratification is very gratifying.