Gorsuch: "In Your View....The Former President"????? - The Great Awakening

Gorsuch: "In Your View....The Former President"????? (twitter.com)

posted 326 days ago by War_Hamster 326 days ago by War_Hamster +76 / -0

11 comments

11 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (11)

sorted by:

▲ 14 ▼

– War_Hamster [S] 14 points 326 days ago +14 / -0

Someone pointed out elsewhere that he was using the CO attorney's hypothetical where he was arguing that Trump stopped being POTUS the moment J6 happened.

Never mind that he was acquitted of "insurrection" in the impeachment trial and has never been charged under 2380.

This clown was actually arguing that they could just arbitrarily declare an insurrection based on the J6 Committee Report, with no ability for Trump to defend himself.

SCOTUS should refer him to the BAR Association for violation of the 6th Amendment.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– BooniesRedneck 4 points 326 days ago +4 / -0

Ah, that makes sense now. Thank you for the explanation.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– War_Hamster [S] 2 points 326 days ago +2 / -0

Cheers.

I had to listen to it a second time myself.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Grady_Wilson 2 points 326 days ago +2 / -0

Yup, the justices even asked if Trump stopped being president the moment Jan 6 happen, then wouldn't it be lawful and just for any subordinate to ignore Trump's orders since he was immediately disqualified from holding the office of the President?

The asshat Murry replied that wouldn't be the case because there are mechanisms in place like chain of command.

So, he is no longer a lawful President but chain of command still exists?

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q