-
Putin believes that Ukraine is historically part of Russia and it's independent existence is only tolerable if the country is firmly in Russia's sphere of influence.
-
He believes the CIA engineered a coup that overthrew the legitimate government of Ukraine and replaced it with a western puppet regime in 2014.
-
He believes the modern nationalist Ukrainian state draws from the legacy of Nazi collaboration during WWII and poses a direct threat to Russian national security. Removing this particular nationalist influence is a key goal of the military operation, which he seeks to achieve through negotiation.
-
Russia expressed interest in joining NATO during the Clinton administration but was rejected. This lead Russia to feel geopolitically isolated and cut off from the whole western project.
-
He believes the west is obsessed with weakening Russia as much as possible and that NATO is nothing more than an anti-Russian alliance.
-
Putin thinks China is now more powerful than the United States and more relevant.
-
He believes our government is controlled by an entrenched bureaucracy that cannot be changed through elections.
-
He believes the US and European Union are extorting taxpayers to fund Ukraine's war. He sees no reason why the US continues to support Ukraine.
Putin Interview Summarized
RUSSIAN SALT MINES 🇷🇺
Can you share this research about Scythian to Tartarians and how they may have lasted for between 2500 and 5000 years?
I would like to. Unfortunately what I have is a book length effort that is not presently complete. I am really bad about publishing anything until I feel the argument for that section is complete. I will get to it at some point.
I was told by someone I sound like Asha Logos and they assumed I had seen his stuff. I had not (at that time). I have since watched a couple of his videos from his series "Conspiracy? Our Subverted History". I disagree with some of his assessment. He doesn't seem to understand the Cabal at all (or pretends that he doesn't) so a lot of his conclusions are wrong imo, but overall, his information and statement of relevant facts is really good. I haven't seen all of that body of work, but I've seen enough that I recommend it.
Of note, the key element to understanding the Scythian Empire is, I believe, in understanding its ruling Aristocracy (i.e. the Aryan Race). It is through this ruling family that the Empire of Scythia is best understood. They are noted by specific phenotypes (blond/red hair, blue/green eyes). These phenotypes occur in the noted leadership of all of the "disparate tribes" of the region throughout history. The evidence for this comes from the burial mounds of what is obviously the Ruling Class (buried with lots of gold e.g.),. It also comes from the same pattern of mounds (same burial rights), the phenotypes of the occupants, and the explicitly stated historical records by all pre 20th century historians going all the way back to the 3rd millennia BC.
In today's history they are all labeled as "strictly nomads," even though they also have cities, trade routes, roads, etc.. They are labeled as "different groups" because the different groups are predominantly of different ethnicity (depending on region and time) even though all the various tribes are provably all multi-ethnic and have the same phenotypes in the Ruling Class.
As important as the information about them is (and relevant to today), I think it is more important to see how history has been hidden/rewritten regarding them. By doing this research on Tartary, it opened my eyes on these methods. I recommend looking out for that in your research (though you probably already do, I just thought I would note it because it was so fruitful for me in this particular research).
Slyver, LatetotheShow: I'm upvoting both of you FWIW. Yes, there's a great deal of history we now have to clean up. Discussion (hopefully in good faith) should help with some of that cleanup. But I have to toss a curve ball, only for discussion:
What if you're both right?
I been brushing up against QED in following the Q thread (Quantum Electrodynamics). There's discussions that we're bouncing across changing history in deriving a better future with some of the unknown tech that's used against us (think Mandala effect; not everyone remembers an old movie happening the same way as it currently is when they saw it 30 years ago, yet the older folk specifically remember it all happening the same different way). Given a long enough timeline of these events happening, could history simply be different on this timeline??
My head hurts, I think I need some chocolate milk (reference Men In Black 3)...