https://skeshel.substack.com/p/light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel-of
The author, Capt. Seth Keshel, briefly discusses The Fourth Turning and some of the relevant history, then lists some of the possible / likely coming changes during this particular Turning.
An excerpt:
. . . Our crisis period is nearing its climax. The authors of The Fourth Turning do not suggest that every crisis period must have a happy ending, but for centuries, they have always dissipated and set out upon a new chapter, or first turning. I won’t spoil the new book for you, but Howe suggests that we are at the cusp of this new beginning based on more than a half-millennium of research into the saecula and generational theory. What could it look like if those who love freedom wind up on the winning side of the climax?
· Worldwide adoption of fiercely nationalistic policies
· Collapse of corrupt financial institutions
· Establishment of American sovereignty over our borders, trade arrangement, and immigration policies
· Rejection of wars of choice and use of western nations as a worldwide police force
· Prosecution of corrupt power brokers without regard to elite status
· Rejection of wokeism and postmodernism that has brought the West to the brink of destruction
In short, a victorious people at the end of a fourth turning in the 2020s stand to see the abolition of the old order, just as those who have survived crisis periods in the past have seen the end of English rule in the former colonies, an end to what had been more than 40 years of hostilities between north and south, and the defeat of the Nazi and Imperial Japanese war machines threatening every nation on earth.
Too bad this is a truncated article, and to read the entire thing requires a subscription.
Same here. I read this earlier and definitely feel an “end” coming.
I just visited https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/in-memory-of-those-who-died-suddenly-513?r=m6kl7, which I don't subscribe to . . . and the link to see the entire article was labeled "No Thanks." Odd, I know; I thought it'd be "Continue" (and in some cases at Substack it might be).
That might not be the case. I subscribe, but when I visit substacks that I DON'T subscribe to, there is (usually) a link that says "Continue" below the links prompting you to become a subscriber. That takes you to the full article. I don't know if ALL substacks operate that way, but take another look . . . the full article might be available without subscribing.
I looked and didn't see that.
I just visited https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/in-memory-of-those-who-died-suddenly-513?r=m6kl7, which I don't subscribe to . . . and the link to see the entire article was labeled "No Thanks."
You'd think that would lead nowhere, or just kick you out of the site, but it took me right to the full article. So "Continue" -- in that case at least -- isn't the word used for the link, but "No Thanks."
I'll check again tomorrow... on the move now.