Fermat's Last Theorem has the peculiar distinction of being the mathematical problem for which the greatest number of incorrect proofs have been published

many years ago, when i was still in school, i discovered Fermat's Last Theorem which is simple math problem that had stumped the best mathematicians in world for well over 300 years.

and i was very intrigued by it, to the point where i spent several hours a day, for years on end, trying to "prove" it was true.

while i wasn't ever able to actually "prove" it was true, it was still a very good tool for practicing your math skills,

and i would highly recommend to anyone who is at all into math, to try and prove Fermat's Last Theorem...

the problem isn't that difficult to understand.

And so literally as i was working on trying to prove Fermat's Last Theorem, there's an announcement made that Fermat's Last Theorem had been proved!

I didn't think too much of it at the time, except i remember wanting to see the proof for myself, you know, for my own curiosity, to see how it was done.

But guess what?

Turns out this guy tried to divide by zero, and so his "proof" was bunk.

Then he spends another year, trying to correct his fatal flaw of dividing by zero, by going off on another tangent.

math pun intended.

And to this very day, i still have yet to see an actual "proof" of anything

What i have seen, are basically "chunks" of random mathematical proofs,

that are kind-of not-very mathematically rigorous,

meaning they use way too much English,

and not enough actual math.

What you will find, are these glowing reviews of the proof, by people who likely never even saw the proof, or didn't understand it even if they did see it.

At the time i was working on proving Fermat's Last Theorem, it had occurred to me that i could be engaged in a fools errand, because it could very well be that it is impossible to prove.

And i still suspect that Fermat's Last Theorem is actually impossible to prove,

And i suspect Andrew Wiles proof is flawed,

And that like so many other things in Clown World,

The mockingbird media goes along with the bullshit about someone achieving the impossible.

"One Small Step, For A Man...

One Giant Leap, For The Morons Who Believe This Bullshit Is Real..."

And so recently I've been spending more time on ChatGPT, and i started asking about Fermat's Last Theorem, and the answers i got were very evasive, suspicious, etc.

like, ChatGPT was telling me it couldn't give me Fermat's Last Theorem because it was copyrighted.

so i asked for a link to Fermat's Last Theorem

my exact prompt: Prove that X^n + Y^n = Z^n has no solutions when n > 2

ChatGPT: The statement you mentioned is known as Fermat's Last Theorem, and it was famously proven by Andrew Wiles in 1994. The proof is quite complex, and involved advanced mathematical concepts. If you're interested in the details, i recommend exploring Wile's original paper for a comprehensive understanding.

me: show me the math here

ChatGPT: Andrew Wiles proof of Fermat's Last Theorem involves several sophisticated mathematical concepts, including modular forms, elicit curves, and Galois representations. It stands over 100 pages and goes beyond what can easily be explained in a brief message.

If you're interested in the the detailed mathematics behind the proof, i recommend reading Wiles original paper titled "Modular Elliptic Curves and Fermat's Last Theorem", published in the Annals of Mathematics in 1995. It provides a thorough explanation of the intricate mathematical reasoning involved in the proof.

me: Prove Fermat's Last Theorem

ChatGPT: 4 long-winded paragraphs basically talking down to me, trying to baffle me with bullshit, while also utterly failing to even attempt to do as i asked.

me: how is it that Fermat could prove his theorem with the math of his day, but Andrew Wiles had to use math that hadn't even been discovered in Fermat's day?

ChatGPT: Fermats proof for Fermat's Last Theorem remains elusive because there no evidence that he actually had a proof... (then 2 more paragraphs of math babble)

BINGO!

i mean, everyone who knows anything about Fermat's Last Theorem knows that there was supposedly brilliant proof, but the margin of this book is too small to contain it.

But here we have ChatGPT stating the elephant in the room, which is that Fermat himself never produced any proof, and if that is true, then why should we expect anyone else to produce a proof? If the man himself couldn't even do it?

How easy would it be to scrawl on the margin of a book,

"i have discovered a truly brilliant way of making a dollar out of 99 cents, but unfortunately the margin of this book is too small to contain it"

its basically trolling.

And when you start asking for the actual proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, you'll notice a weird kind of push-back.

And it has all the classical signs of being professional trolls or shills,

for example instead of simply showing you the math, they will imply that you are too stupid to understand the math.

so then we must assume that these trolls and shills are smart enough to understand the math... right?

so we ask them to explain it to us, since they are obviously smart.

and they will get all squirrelly and elusive,

and it becomes clear that they don't understand the math either,

and yet, its a really weird topic for someone to take an interest in, enough to become a shill or a troll, and yet these same people don't take enough of an interest to actually understand what it is that they are mouthing off about?

do they understand the proof is shit,

and are simply propping up the official story?

So here we have Andrew Wiles, being the public face of the fake proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, which can't be proven.

Wiles had already published one false proof, like so many others before him.

Its almost certain that his next proof was also false, which is why they don't want you to debate the finer details of the supposed proof.

if we could clearly debunk Wiles proof, we could embarrass the entire math and science community,

So think about this... for well over 300 years, this very simple math problem has been shown over and over and over to be impossible to prove, with every single "proof" ever published, eventually being shown to be false, including Fermat's own supposed proof, that probably never even existed...

Then we have CHatGPT, which should be as smart as 100 top mathematicians,

and instead of just cranking out this proof, one line of math at a time, step-by-step, from beginning to end,

we get excuses. we get hemming and hawing. we get re-directed.

If ChatGPT is so smart, why can't it even attempt to explain the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem?

ChatGPT is behaving like someone who has something to hide.

please share this post, in your social circles, and try to generate some interest in the topic.

this story has intrigued audiences for over 300 years, and will continue to intrigue audiences for many more years, because its impossible to solve, and yet fools will keep trying.

fools like me.

do not let them get away with simply presenting the proof as if its true, and putting the onus on the audience to prove its false.

quite the opposite. the onus is on Wiles, to prove his proof is true.

its 100 pages of techno babble that doesn't prove anything.

but they will just claim that you are an idiot for not understanding their math...

the math that they themselves can't really explain.

So heres the thing... Fermat's Last Theorem is a very simple problem, and if there was any actual proof, it should be well within your mathematical ability to see it, and understand it, and explain it to another person.

Do you know Pythagorean Theorem?

A^2 + B^2 = C^2

you can probably apply this theorem, for a quiz.

you can probably explain this theorem, to a student.

and if you have already learned this much in math class, then you can also learn about Fermat's Last Theorem.

and yet, you still aren't learning anything about the actual proof of Fermat's Last Theorem,

you can't apply it, for a quiz,

you can't explain it to a student.

do they teach Fermat's Last Theorem proof as a math class?

so instead of explaining this supposedly brilliant math proof,

they imply we are all too illiterate to understand the proof.

it has that same feel of the COVID vaccine.

just accept it, and stop asking so many questions.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

• William J. Casey, CIA Director (1981)

it is far easier for them to lie to us, than it is for us to prove that they are lying.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem

https://archive.is/b1DlN

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wiles

https://archive.is/E7rkG

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiles's_proof_of_Fermat's_Last_Theorem