Question: Who were using these red glowing eyes prior to this Joe Biden post for years?
Answer: The Anons.
Question: Who told you "The fun begins right after the Superbowl?
Answer: The Q-Drops.
Question: Who told you the White House was empty?
Answer: The Judges.
Question: Who told you there
(twitter.com)
MORE 🍿 WE NEED MORE 🍿
Ariel's content is ineligible for monetization per Twitter policy.
https://business.twitter.com/en/help/troubleshooting/amplify-publisher-faqs.html
That's in regards to video content.
And he rarely posts original videos, though he does link to some.
See how that works?
I do find it highly disconcerting that so many here are defending people who just came out of nowhere, and basically tell them what they want to hear... And profit from it.
It's just really odd to me the fervor over comments I made that were fairly innocuous in nature
It's really odd you were asked for proof of a claim?
And I posted a sublink from this main page -
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/content-monetization-standards
His content doesn't meet the criteria for monetization.
No, what's odd is the reaction overall, not from you personally.
And his content does qualify for monetization. There are emails that were released of her {Ariel} and another poster talking about how they could help each other out. There's an entire circle of them interconnected.
And he profits In the same way Dom did for the last 18 months. The only reason Dom was demonetized was for a very specific post\ posts that espoused the same general theme.
His content was questionable the entire time he has been posting. He was still allowed to profit from it.
Why not link to these emails?