Question: Who were using these red glowing eyes prior to this Joe Biden post for years?
Answer: The Anons.
Question: Who told you "The fun begins right after the Superbowl?
Answer: The Q-Drops.
Question: Who told you the White House was empty?
Answer: The Judges.
Question: Who told you there
(twitter.com)
MORE 🍿 WE NEED MORE 🍿
No, I don't understand why you're rhetorically asking yourself if you believe what a person you don't care about posted.
If you don't care about @H4ckerRogue, why do you post a link to a Threadreader archive he requested to be unrolled himself as if it's some kind of proof? Not even a single archived link to a Tweet, just screenshots, by the way.
I did find it odd @H4ckerRogue seems to be simping hard for Nigel Farage and posts links to Crypto mining scams on Telegram. Misspelling "mining" as "minning" was a nice touch as well...
https://twitter.com/H4ckerRogue/status/1741394553406464024
Edit - I also see he namedropped @13thKai
https://twitter.com/H4ckerRogue/status/1723733358457352682
A quick review of @13thKai's account turned up this gem -
"God created Lucifer. Lucifer is one of God's children. God already has an understanding with Satan. God and Satan live in symbiosis. They need each other. God needs Satan to test His Children here on earth to see if they are worthy to return to Him. Satan needs God's children."
https://twitter.com/13thKai/status/1757245862517088636
Maybe you should work on vetting your sources, perhaps?
He offers proof about the dark judge, some of the info which I personally validated. Some is no longer available.
Any other posts he's made I haven't looked into.
I find it more than odd that you're simping for the dark judge and Ariel
Do you know them? Trust them implicitly?
Or do you just hope that they're above board to make yourself feel better about what you believe?
You personally validated it but you don't have any other sources?
Smart.
Also, digging into claims is what anons do. There's nothing odd about vetting and questioning the sources you provided.
I don't take anything any Twitter account states at face value, thank you very much.
I don't take anything any Twitter account states at face value, thank you very much
That's good to hear but it begs the question-then what the fuck are you on about?
Anyway yes, I did validate certain aspects of this story because it's readily available on social media and it's the same guy with the same names. And prior interactions with other Twitter user under the same handle.
Which is much more than you have done, I can guarantee you that
I'm asking for sources for your claims.
Your sources suck.
And you have no idea on what I've researched.