The vaccine was originally tested nearly a decade ago during the West African Ebola epidemic, where initial trial results indicated it could be 100% effective at preventing Ebola

No vaccine is 100% effective, and anyone who claims a vaccine is 100% effective is lying.

The new study was the first time that researchers calculated Ebola mortality among people who had received the vaccine and then experienced a breakthrough infection.

So even though the vaccine failed miserably, its still “100% effective” in clown world.

According to their analysis, the fatality rate among 423 participants who had received the vaccine was approximately 25%. Among unvaccinated participants, it was 56%.

100% effective?

The vaccine’s protective effect increased the longer a person had been vaccinated, with the mortality rate falling from 27% among participants vaccinated just 2 days or fewer from the onset of their symptoms to 18% among those who received the vaccine 10 days or more before they got sick.

In other words, the vaccine itself is causing ebola?

The results demonstrate that “vaccine failure is still compatible with high effectiveness,” the researchers wrote.

Vaccine quacks will do impressive mental gymnastics to maintain their delusional narratives

They listed several potential reasons other than primary vaccine failure for the more than 400 breakthrough infections identified during the study, including cold chain failure, inadequate dosing or injection technique, and immunosuppression.

Couldn’t possibly be that the vaccine is a miserable failure, and actually causes more ebola than it prevents…

“Our results reinforce the importance of vaccinating populations who are at risk of exposure to Ebola virus to reduce the risk of infection and — if infection occurs — the risk of death,” the researchers wrote.

No matter what the data actually show, their interpretation is always “safe and effective”

They get away with publishing this garbage because their audience is just as brainwashed as the authors are.