THESE people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020
But that is not what THIS case is about. THIS case is about nepotistic appointments and wasteful expenditure of public funds.
Irrelevant.
Also, to argue the fallacious logic in her point: THESE people she is talking about, are saying that the election WAS stolen - and that idea is used as proof that they are trying to steal something.
Point of order: The accused party in the OTHER CASE were not succesful in 'Stealing' because they are not in power. So, this accusation needs to prove intent, not guilt. Which is problematic. At the logical end of that argument is that the accused was not succesful in the alleged 'stealing'.
Can someone be accused of being a wanna-be thief and be convicted, if they only 'thought of stealing' and did not actually steal?
But that is not what THIS case is about. THIS case is about nepotistic appointments and wasteful expenditure of public funds.
Irrelevant.
Also, to argue the fallacious logic in her point: THESE people she is talking about, are saying that the election WAS stolen - and that idea is used as proof that they are trying to steal something.
Point of order: The accused party in the OTHER CASE were not succesful in 'Stealing' because they are not in power. So, this accusation needs to prove intent, not guilt. Which is problematic. At the logical end of that argument is that the accused was not succesful in the alleged 'stealing'.
Can someone be accused of being a wanna-be thief and be convicted, if they only 'thought of stealing' and did not actually steal?
Also: this is turning into a Judge Judy or something.
The thought police are coming for you ! I heard that in a song somewhere.
Cheap Trick? The dream police they are coming for you?