I'm not anywhere near defending her, but also have yet to be convinced that she's not a true patriot. am I missing something? happy to look at any sauce you have
Check out her video where she was smearing Sound of Freedom while confessing she didnt even bother to watch it. She went so far as to call them all pedos with zero evidence and a lot of rhetorics. For me it neatly tied all the other red flags she has been throwing throwing up that screams "limited hangout"
But there IS a lot of evidence of Tim Ballard being, at the very least, a fraud. It looks much like the Eliza Bleu situation, but on a much larger scale.
I used to be a supporter of Operation Underground Railroad and promoted "Sound of Freedom" to everyone I could when it was coming out, but when I started actually looking into Tim Ballard, my intuition started ringing "alarm bells". There were so many warning signs and suspicious things, including his Clinton Administration connections, the fact that many of his stories contradict all available evidence of the events in question, and his connections to the upper echelons of the leadership of the Mormon church (which has been involved in human trafficking since its inception).
Then I discovered the investigative reporter Lynn Kenneth Packer (who exposed Paul H. Dunn as a fraud years ago). He made a series of videos on his YouTube channel alleging that Tim Ballard is a fraud who made up or embellished most of his stories, misused donated funds to make himself and his family rich, etc.
Now allegations are one thing - but Packer actually brings the receipts. He has shown some very damning evidence, including police reports that prove Ballard to have been lying on multiple occasions. Unlike the mainstream media, Packer is also fair - when he comes across an allegation about Ballard that doesn't have the evidence to back it up, he makes it clear that the claim is unfounded.
I would love it if Packer is wrong and Ballard is a genuine hero, but the preponderance of evidence points strongly in the other direction.
Dude, judge people by the fruits of their labour. Sound of Freedom opened up so many normies to understand the extent of pedo problem. You can actually talk about it without being labled a "conspiracy QAnon guy" any more.
Here is the real question you should be asking. Has anyone provided any compelling evidence that Tim Ballard did not rescue any children. If not, no one who has not saved a child can throw stones on any other aspect - be it who funded him to whether he was connected to Clinton Administration, or whether he lied to the police.
And lying to the police? Is that a measure for anything when you are working against the system where police are part of it? Where they can actually coerce the very women you have rescued to turn against him?
Seriously, if you have anything to prove that he has not rescued any children I would be the first to watch it. If not, anyone who expends their ammo to "expose" him are basically the real controlled oppositions.
Unlike the mainstream media, Packer is also fair
This is the hallmark of a real controlled opposition. They are someone that the community implictly trusts.
There is no better litmus test for sniffing out controlled opposition that SOF.
Controlled opposition who showed her hand too quickly and got caught out, and now gets called out every time she attacks someone. Poor baby, boo hoo.
I'm not anywhere near defending her, but also have yet to be convinced that she's not a true patriot. am I missing something? happy to look at any sauce you have
Check out her video where she was smearing Sound of Freedom while confessing she didnt even bother to watch it. She went so far as to call them all pedos with zero evidence and a lot of rhetorics. For me it neatly tied all the other red flags she has been throwing throwing up that screams "limited hangout"
But there IS a lot of evidence of Tim Ballard being, at the very least, a fraud. It looks much like the Eliza Bleu situation, but on a much larger scale.
I used to be a supporter of Operation Underground Railroad and promoted "Sound of Freedom" to everyone I could when it was coming out, but when I started actually looking into Tim Ballard, my intuition started ringing "alarm bells". There were so many warning signs and suspicious things, including his Clinton Administration connections, the fact that many of his stories contradict all available evidence of the events in question, and his connections to the upper echelons of the leadership of the Mormon church (which has been involved in human trafficking since its inception).
Then I discovered the investigative reporter Lynn Kenneth Packer (who exposed Paul H. Dunn as a fraud years ago). He made a series of videos on his YouTube channel alleging that Tim Ballard is a fraud who made up or embellished most of his stories, misused donated funds to make himself and his family rich, etc.
Now allegations are one thing - but Packer actually brings the receipts. He has shown some very damning evidence, including police reports that prove Ballard to have been lying on multiple occasions. Unlike the mainstream media, Packer is also fair - when he comes across an allegation about Ballard that doesn't have the evidence to back it up, he makes it clear that the claim is unfounded.
I would love it if Packer is wrong and Ballard is a genuine hero, but the preponderance of evidence points strongly in the other direction.
Here's Packer's YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@lynnkennethpacker8389/videos
Dude, judge people by the fruits of their labour. Sound of Freedom opened up so many normies to understand the extent of pedo problem. You can actually talk about it without being labled a "conspiracy QAnon guy" any more.
Here is the real question you should be asking. Has anyone provided any compelling evidence that Tim Ballard did not rescue any children. If not, no one who has not saved a child can throw stones on any other aspect - be it who funded him to whether he was connected to Clinton Administration, or whether he lied to the police.
And lying to the police? Is that a measure for anything when you are working against the system where police are part of it? Where they can actually coerce the very women you have rescued to turn against him?
Seriously, if you have anything to prove that he has not rescued any children I would be the first to watch it. If not, anyone who expends their ammo to "expose" him are basically the real controlled oppositions.
This is the hallmark of a real controlled opposition. They are someone that the community implictly trusts.
There is no better litmus test for sniffing out controlled opposition that SOF.