I'm not anywhere near defending her, but also have yet to be convinced that she's not a true patriot. am I missing something? happy to look at any sauce you have
Check out her video where she was smearing Sound of Freedom while confessing she didnt even bother to watch it. She went so far as to call them all pedos with zero evidence and a lot of rhetorics. For me it neatly tied all the other red flags she has been throwing throwing up that screams "limited hangout"
But there IS a lot of evidence of Tim Ballard being, at the very least, a fraud. It looks much like the Eliza Bleu situation, but on a much larger scale.
I used to be a supporter of Operation Underground Railroad and promoted "Sound of Freedom" to everyone I could when it was coming out, but when I started actually looking into Tim Ballard, my intuition started ringing "alarm bells". There were so many warning signs and suspicious things, including his Clinton Administration connections, the fact that many of his stories contradict all available evidence of the events in question, and his connections to the upper echelons of the leadership of the Mormon church (which has been involved in human trafficking since its inception).
Then I discovered the investigative reporter Lynn Kenneth Packer (who exposed Paul H. Dunn as a fraud years ago). He made a series of videos on his YouTube channel alleging that Tim Ballard is a fraud who made up or embellished most of his stories, misused donated funds to make himself and his family rich, etc.
Now allegations are one thing - but Packer actually brings the receipts. He has shown some very damning evidence, including police reports that prove Ballard to have been lying on multiple occasions. Unlike the mainstream media, Packer is also fair - when he comes across an allegation about Ballard that doesn't have the evidence to back it up, he makes it clear that the claim is unfounded.
I would love it if Packer is wrong and Ballard is a genuine hero, but the preponderance of evidence points strongly in the other direction.
Dude, judge people by the fruits of their labour. Sound of Freedom opened up so many normies to understand the extent of pedo problem. You can actually talk about it without being labled a "conspiracy QAnon guy" any more.
Here is the real question you should be asking. Has anyone provided any compelling evidence that Tim Ballard did not rescue any children. If not, no one who has not saved a child can throw stones on any other aspect - be it who funded him to whether he was connected to Clinton Administration, or whether he lied to the police.
And lying to the police? Is that a measure for anything when you are working against the system where police are part of it? Where they can actually coerce the very women you have rescued to turn against him?
Seriously, if you have anything to prove that he has not rescued any children I would be the first to watch it. If not, anyone who expends their ammo to "expose" him are basically the real controlled oppositions.
Unlike the mainstream media, Packer is also fair
This is the hallmark of a real controlled opposition. They are someone that the community implictly trusts.
There is no better litmus test for sniffing out controlled opposition that SOF.
you don't find Jim Caviezel and Tim Ballard to have questionable past ties? people can change and all that, but it seems we might want to be very careful about blindly trusting these guys or anyone without some skepticism
She has had health issues, especially with her eyes. I like Polly, very much. I like her research a lot more than some others. She does connect the dots, and isn’t afraid to call out others that people creep onto, like Jordan Peterson, etc.
Lets think about this for a second, Anon. What is the first requirement for someone to be a controlled opposition? They gotta be a trusted member of the movement that the rank and file trust and follow. People like Weinstein and Campbell are mainstream. No one on our side trust them or follow their opinions. We only care about the content they create that can be shared with the normies.
If anything, people like Campbell are controlled opposition for the mainstream. They are people that normies follow, and when they start dispensing redpill (no matter how small the dosage is), they reach thousands of normies. These are people who would never watch Steve Kirsch, for instance. But they watch Campbell because he bases all his videos purely on scientific studies.
There are so many people around me who only started taking note of vaccine injuries after I shared Campbell videos because they have no reason to suspect him.
People like this have a specific role, and it is in the late stage of Awakening for this very reason. They are not cutting edge. But they cut through the mainstream.
But Amazing Polly on the other hand, someone that many Anons trust and respect and is part of the truther movement for a long time? Yes, she can be a controlled opposition. And what is the damage she can do to Anons who trust her? The only effect these videos of hers can have on us is if they make us stop sharing the redpills just because we think they are coming from a "controlled opposition". She is trying to deny the ammunition we should be using with full force. And that is the real definition of controlled opposition.
Amazing Polly used to be linked all the time couple years ago. Her heydays were in 2021 with her wayfair crap. Since then she has tried everything to stay relevant but her digs never turn up anything substantial, just a whole lot of boring irrelevant things we already know. Since then Anons got bored and she lost traction here and elsewhere. Now she is trying to make a comeback by attacking everyone else.
I'm so glad you said that!! I thought it was only me and my bitchy self. Last time I tried to listen to her post, she kept knocking anyone who disagreed with her, and talking as tho SHE AND SHE ALONE knows the absolute plan or lack thereof. I couldn't take it. At least contemplating other viewpoints expands my thinking. I may still not agree after I've considered their points, but I have been surprised a time or two to learn something new and see a situation in a slightly different light.
Controlled opposition who showed her hand too quickly and got caught out, and now gets called out every time she attacks someone. Poor baby, boo hoo.
She's put out some great content. I miss her decodes.
I'm not anywhere near defending her, but also have yet to be convinced that she's not a true patriot. am I missing something? happy to look at any sauce you have
Check out her video where she was smearing Sound of Freedom while confessing she didnt even bother to watch it. She went so far as to call them all pedos with zero evidence and a lot of rhetorics. For me it neatly tied all the other red flags she has been throwing throwing up that screams "limited hangout"
But there IS a lot of evidence of Tim Ballard being, at the very least, a fraud. It looks much like the Eliza Bleu situation, but on a much larger scale.
I used to be a supporter of Operation Underground Railroad and promoted "Sound of Freedom" to everyone I could when it was coming out, but when I started actually looking into Tim Ballard, my intuition started ringing "alarm bells". There were so many warning signs and suspicious things, including his Clinton Administration connections, the fact that many of his stories contradict all available evidence of the events in question, and his connections to the upper echelons of the leadership of the Mormon church (which has been involved in human trafficking since its inception).
Then I discovered the investigative reporter Lynn Kenneth Packer (who exposed Paul H. Dunn as a fraud years ago). He made a series of videos on his YouTube channel alleging that Tim Ballard is a fraud who made up or embellished most of his stories, misused donated funds to make himself and his family rich, etc.
Now allegations are one thing - but Packer actually brings the receipts. He has shown some very damning evidence, including police reports that prove Ballard to have been lying on multiple occasions. Unlike the mainstream media, Packer is also fair - when he comes across an allegation about Ballard that doesn't have the evidence to back it up, he makes it clear that the claim is unfounded.
I would love it if Packer is wrong and Ballard is a genuine hero, but the preponderance of evidence points strongly in the other direction.
Here's Packer's YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@lynnkennethpacker8389/videos
Dude, judge people by the fruits of their labour. Sound of Freedom opened up so many normies to understand the extent of pedo problem. You can actually talk about it without being labled a "conspiracy QAnon guy" any more.
Here is the real question you should be asking. Has anyone provided any compelling evidence that Tim Ballard did not rescue any children. If not, no one who has not saved a child can throw stones on any other aspect - be it who funded him to whether he was connected to Clinton Administration, or whether he lied to the police.
And lying to the police? Is that a measure for anything when you are working against the system where police are part of it? Where they can actually coerce the very women you have rescued to turn against him?
Seriously, if you have anything to prove that he has not rescued any children I would be the first to watch it. If not, anyone who expends their ammo to "expose" him are basically the real controlled oppositions.
This is the hallmark of a real controlled opposition. They are someone that the community implictly trusts.
There is no better litmus test for sniffing out controlled opposition that SOF.
Never heard of that. Got any link?
you don't find Jim Caviezel and Tim Ballard to have questionable past ties? people can change and all that, but it seems we might want to be very careful about blindly trusting these guys or anyone without some skepticism
That was her end in my eyes.
She’s aged in dog years. WTF.
It looks like she has cancer. She got skinny and has a drawn face. Concerning!
She is one of my favorite anons. She really connects the dots.
She has had health issues, especially with her eyes. I like Polly, very much. I like her research a lot more than some others. She does connect the dots, and isn’t afraid to call out others that people creep onto, like Jordan Peterson, etc.
I wish her all the best.
❤️ Me, too.
She’s calling out the controlled opposition dude
Lets think about this for a second, Anon. What is the first requirement for someone to be a controlled opposition? They gotta be a trusted member of the movement that the rank and file trust and follow. People like Weinstein and Campbell are mainstream. No one on our side trust them or follow their opinions. We only care about the content they create that can be shared with the normies.
If anything, people like Campbell are controlled opposition for the mainstream. They are people that normies follow, and when they start dispensing redpill (no matter how small the dosage is), they reach thousands of normies. These are people who would never watch Steve Kirsch, for instance. But they watch Campbell because he bases all his videos purely on scientific studies.
There are so many people around me who only started taking note of vaccine injuries after I shared Campbell videos because they have no reason to suspect him.
People like this have a specific role, and it is in the late stage of Awakening for this very reason. They are not cutting edge. But they cut through the mainstream.
But Amazing Polly on the other hand, someone that many Anons trust and respect and is part of the truther movement for a long time? Yes, she can be a controlled opposition. And what is the damage she can do to Anons who trust her? The only effect these videos of hers can have on us is if they make us stop sharing the redpills just because we think they are coming from a "controlled opposition". She is trying to deny the ammunition we should be using with full force. And that is the real definition of controlled opposition.
Amazing Polly used to be linked all the time couple years ago. Her heydays were in 2021 with her wayfair crap. Since then she has tried everything to stay relevant but her digs never turn up anything substantial, just a whole lot of boring irrelevant things we already know. Since then Anons got bored and she lost traction here and elsewhere. Now she is trying to make a comeback by attacking everyone else.
I listened to her once a long time ago.
That was one too many times.
I didn't like something about her
My instinct was spot on.
I'm so glad you said that!! I thought it was only me and my bitchy self. Last time I tried to listen to her post, she kept knocking anyone who disagreed with her, and talking as tho SHE AND SHE ALONE knows the absolute plan or lack thereof. I couldn't take it. At least contemplating other viewpoints expands my thinking. I may still not agree after I've considered their points, but I have been surprised a time or two to learn something new and see a situation in a slightly different light.
She is condescending. I don't understand how people can listen to her.